Adrenergic alpha-1 receptor antagonists in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in women:a systematic review

Xiao-ming WANG,Qiang WEI,Ping HAN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-8291.2015.09.004
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of alpha‐1‐blockers in the treatment of female lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) .Methods Randomized or controlled clinical trials comparing alpha‐1‐blockers monotherapy with cotherapy of antimuscarinics and alpha‐1‐blockers ,placebo and other types of therapy in the treatment of female LUTS were i‐dentified by electronic and manual retrieval and analysis .The methodological quality of the included trials was assessed by mod‐ified Jadad scoring system and Meta‐analysis was performed with Revman 5.3 software .Results Altogether 10 eligible ran‐domized controlled trials (n=1198) were included in this systematic review ,of which 7 were included for qualitative analysis and 3 for quantitative analysis .Meta‐analysis showed that there were significant improvements on international prostate symp‐tom score [mean difference (MD) = -2 .26 ,95% CI (-2 .60 ,-1 .92) ,P<0 .001) and average flow rate (MD=1 .41 ,95%CI (0 .67 ,2 .14) ,P=0 .000 2] .There was no significant difference regarding maximum flow rate (MD= 0 .41 ,95% CI (-0.96 ,1 .79) ,P=0 .56) .Qualitative analysis indicated combined therapy with antimuscarinics and alpha‐1‐blockers was more ef‐fective ,which could significantly improved both symptoms and subjective urodynamic parameters .Combined with extracorporeal magnetic innervations or uroflowmetry biofeedback ,alpha‐1‐blockers could obtain significant therapeutic effects as well .All 10 articles reported side effects but no serious adverse events were reported .Conclusions Monotherapy of alpha‐1‐blockers may ameliorate lower urinary tract symptoms and improve urodynamic parameters in women .Combined therapy was more effica‐cious than monotherapy .Alpha‐1‐blockers were well tolerated and the overall incidence of adverse events was low .Due to lim‐ited number of the included studies ,the above mentioned conclusions still need to be verified with more data .
What problem does this paper attempt to address?