Abstract:Purpose of study: There is a growing recognition in the area of back pain research that evaluation of health-related quality of life (HRQL) is important for assessing the treatment effectiveness and for making clinical decisions. Numerous measures have been developed to assess HRQL. Among them, Short Form 12-item survey (SF-12) has become many back pain researchers' top choice, because this instrument is much shorter than many other HRQL measures and can significantly reduce the burden of respondents and the cost for data collection. Despite its widespread use, the validity and responsiveness of SF-12 in patients with back pain have not been well established. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the validity and responsiveness of SF-12 in patients with back pain. Methods used: Starting from January 1998, patients who consulted the Duke University Spine Center were asked to complete a comprehensive computerized survey questionnaire. The questionnaire included SF-12, Oswestry Back Disability Index and questions concerning patients' demographic characteristics, psychosocioeconomic status, medical history, present spine symptoms and the severity of back pain. A total of 2,520 patients who indicated in their first surveys that they had back pain were included in the validity study. Of these patients, 506 completed another survey in 3 to 6 months of follow-up and were used for assessing the responsiveness of SF-12. Only construct validity was evaluated, because content validity has been established, and the current lack of the “gold standard” for HRQL measure makes it difficult to determine the criteria validity. Construct validity was evaluated by assessing the correlation between the two summary scales of SF-12 and six other measures theoretically related or unrelated to these scales. of findings: Physical component summary of SF-12 (PSC-12) was significantly correlated with age, back pain, measures of overall well being and Oswestry Back Disability Index. Mental component summary of SF-12 (MCS-12) was significantly correlated with stress, depression, back pain, measures of overall well being and Oswestry Back Disability Index. Both PCS and MCS performed as expected without exception, demonstrating the construct validity of SF-12. The responsiveness of SF-12 was supported by several pieces of evidence. First, the changes in PCS-12 and MCS-12 were significantly correlated with the changes in back pain intensity. Second, for patients whose back pain improved, there was a significant increase in the follow-up PCS-12 and MCS-12 as compared with the baseline. Third, in the group whose back pain became improved or became worse, small to large effect size was obtained for PCS-12 or MCS-12. Relationship between findings and existing knowledge: To our knowledge, the current study is the first to evaluate the validity and responsiveness of SF-12 in patients with back pain. Overall Significance of findings: The current study demonstrated that SF-12 was a valid and responsive instrument for measuring health status or HRQL in patients with back pain. Given its brevity and the current findings, SF-12 may be considered as a useful outcome tool in the future back pain research. Disclosures: No disclosures. Conflict of interest: No conflicts.

Reliability and validity of simplified Chinese version of Roland-Morris disability questionnaire for evaluating urban and rural patients with low back pain

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of simplified Chinese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

Validity and Reliability of Simplified Chinese Version of Oswestry Disability Index with Chronic Low Back Pain Induced by Lumbar Chronic Paraspinal Compartment Syndrome

[Reliability and Validity of a Short-Form Health Survey Scale (SF-36), Chinese Version Used in an Elderly Population of Zhejiang Province in China].

The Reliability and Validity of the Simplified Chinese Version of the Oswestry Disability Index for Treating Lumbar Disc Herniation in the Community

Simplified Chinese Version of the Back Pain Function Scale (BPFS) for Patients with Low Back Pain

Validity of Chinese Version of Oswestry Disability Index in Assessment for Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain

Validation of the Simplified Chinese Version of the Oswestry Disability Index

Adaption and validation of simplified Chinese version of the Low Back Pain Knowledge questionnaire (sC-LKQ)

Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, Oswestry Disability Index, and Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: Which has Superior Measurement Properties in Older Adults with Low Back Pain?

Responsiveness of the Chinese version of the Oswestry disability index in patients with chronic low back pain

Translation, Cross-cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Hausa Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire in Mixed Rural and Urban Nigerian Populations with Low Back Pain

Validation of the Chinese version of the Oswestry Disability Index

Psychometric validation of the adapted Traditional Chinese version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ)

Re-evaluation of Reliability and Validity of Simplified Chinese Version of SRS-22 Patient Questionnaire

Research Progress of Low Back Pain Disability Assessment Scale (review)

Validation of the EQ-5D in a general population sample in urban China

Validation of the Simplified Chinese version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI)

Improvement of Oswestry disability index and its test of reliability and validity

Validity and responsiveness of Short Form 12-item survey in patients with back pain

Adapted Simplified Chinese (mainland) Version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 Questionnaire