Plasmakinetic bipolar transurethral resection versus traditional transurethral resection of bladder cancer:a systematic review

孔祥斌,汪锡兴,范宁,李雨峰,王志平
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4416.2015.01.008
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objectives To compare the efficacy and safety of Plasmakinetic bipolar transurethral resection with monopolar transurethral resection of bladder cancer.Methods All randomized controlled trials (RCT) of Plasmakinetic bipolar and Monopolar transurethral resection for the treatment of bladder tumor were collected.The quality of included RCTs was assessed.Relevant data was selected according to the standard of Cochrane systematic review.Statistical soft ware RevMan 5.2 was used for Meta analysis.Results 8 randomized controlled trials with 953 cases were included.The results showed that between the two groups,there was no significant difference in the bladder perforation rate[OR =0.17,95% CI(0.33,1.52),P =0.38] in the surgery,the 2-year recurrence rate [OR =0.62,CI95 % (0.30,1.32),P =0.22] and the Catheterization time [SMD =-0.78,95 % CI (-2.35,0.78),P =0.33].Compared with the monopolar transurethral resection,the Plasmakinetic bipolar transurethral resection had shorter procedure times [SMD =-2.42,95 % CI (-4.61,-0.23),P =0.03],lesser blood loss during surgery[SMD =-15.65,95% CI(-22.40,-8.91),P <0.00001],lower incidence of Obturator nerve reflectivity [OR =0.54,95% CI(0.35,0.83),P =0.005] and higher scores of the life quality after surgery[SMD =19.26,95% CI (17.34,21.18),P <0.00001].Conclusions Plasmakinetic bipolar transurethral resect.ion of bladder tumor can shorten the operation time,decrease the blood loss during surgery,reduce the incidence of obturator nerve reflex,and improve the quality of life of patients.More high-quality randomized controlled trials with large samples are required to verify the findings.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?