Curative effectiveness of single-hole vs.three-hole laparoscopy for inguinal hernia repair

Bo Wang,Xun Cai,Yong Liu,Chuiji Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-5591.2017.01.015

2017-01-01

Abstract:Objective To investigate the difference in the curative effectiveness of single-hole vs.three-hole laparoscopy for inguinal hernia repair.Methods The clinical data of 205 patients diagnosed as having inguinal hernia undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in our department from June 2011 to June 2016 were retrospectively collected.205 patients were divided into single-(129 cases) and three-hole (76 cases) groups,and the differences in patients' sex structure,age distribution,the average BMI,operation time,transit operation rate (conversion of single-hole method to three-hole method or laparoscopy to the traditional open surgery) and the incidence of postoperative complications were compared between two groups.Results There were no significant differences in gender structure,average age,average BMI and hernia type (unilateral or bilateral) (P＞0.05 for all) between two groups.The operation time in the single-hole group was relatively long (single-hole group vs.threehole group:55.3 ± 22.8 vs.49.4 ± 14.9 main),but the difference showed no statistically significant difference between two group (P =0.06),and there was no significance difference in conversion rate between two groups (P =0.98).There was no significance difference in postoperative urinary retention and infection of incision between two groups,but postoperative pain degree was milder,and postoperative hospital time was shorter in the single-hole group than in the three-hole group with the difference being statistically significant (P＜0.05).There was no significant difference in general hospitalization cost between two groups (single-hole group vs.three-hole group:2.21 ± 0.65 vs.2.55 ± 0.89) (P＞0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence postoperative hematoma formation,subcutaneous emphysema,and chronic pain between two groups (P＞0.05),but as compared with the three hole group,incidence of complications in single-hole group had a decreased trend.Conclusions Single hole laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is relative safe,and has more advantages on health economic indicators and minimally invasive surgery,which matches the concept of fast track surgery better and is worth of further clinical study.