Effects of different frequency electrical stimulation on fibroblast cell cycle and proliferation in mice

Qian CHEN,Li HONG,Yang LI,Su－ting LI

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969／j.issn.1674－4020.2019.12.23

2019-01-01

Abstract:Objective To investigate the effect of electrical stimulation with different frequencies on the cell cycle and proliferation of L 929 cells (mouse fibroblasts); to explore the possible mechanism of pelvic floor electrical stimulation with different frequencies in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) for mild and moderate female patients ; to provide the corresponding theoretical basis for clinical treatment of electrical stimulation in SUI.Methods L 929 cells were subjected to direct current stimulation at 4 different frequencies (25 Hz, 50 Hz, 75 Hz, 100 Hz) for 2 h with the modified variable frequency cell electrical stimulation device.No electrical stimulation was performed in the control group.After the electrical stimulation intervention , all cells were cultured for another 12 hours.The cell cycle was detected by propidium iodide staining and flow cytometry , and the proliferation index was calculated.In addition, EdU proliferation kit was used to detect the cell proliferation after electrical stimulation , and the cell proliferation rate was calculated after count.Results Compared with the control group , the proliferation index of L 929 cells was significantly increased in the 25Hz electric stimulation group ( P＜0.01); the proportion of L 929 cells in the G0／G1 phase was significantly decreased (P＜0.05); the proportion of L 929 cells in the S phase and G2／M phase was significantly increased ( P＜0.01).The proportion of cells in the G0／G1 phase was significantly decreased in the 50Hz group (P＜0.05), and the proportion of cells in the S phase was significantly increased compared with the control group (P＜0.01).The proportion of cells in the G0／G1 phase was significantly reduced in the 75 Hz and 100 Hz electric stimulation groups (P＜0.05); the proportion of cells in the S phase was significantly lower than that in the control group (P＜0.05).The EdU proliferation test found that the proliferation rate of the cells in the lower frequency groups (25 Hz and 50 Hz) was significantly higher than that in the control group ( P ＜0.05), and the proliferation rate of the cells in the higher frequency groups (75 Hz and 100 Hz) was significantly lower (P＜0.05).Conclusion Lower frequency(25 Hz) direct current stimulation can directly promote fibroblasts from the relatively static G 0／G1 phase to the DNA synthesis phase, accelerate the cell cycle process , and promote cell proliferation.Lower frequency electrical stimulation may help female pelvic floor function recovery by promoting fibroblast proliferation to restore the metabolism and remodeling of extracellular matrix in female pelvic floor support system.