Comparison of clinical features between multifocal versus diffuse hepatic hemangiomas and identification of new subtype in infants

林伟鸿,何渊彬,李凯,姚伟,董岿然,肖现民,方一凡
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn421158-20200326-00201
2020-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To further classify liver hemangiomas to examine whether or not a continuum existed between multifocal versus diffuse liver hemangioma.Methods:Between January 2000 and January 2020, a total of 43 children with a diagnosis of multifocal or diffuse hepatic hemangioma at Children's Hospital of Fudan University were analyzed retrospectively. They were divided into multifocal-type (n=34) and diffuse-type (n=9) groups according to radiological features. And multifocal-type group was further divided into countable (MC)(n=6) or uncountable (MU)(n=28) subgroups according to whether lesions were countable or not. Clinical features between each group were compared.Results:For MC, MU and diffuse-type groups, the incidence of cutaneous hemangioma was 66.7%(4/6), 50.0%(14/28) and 44.4%(4/9); the incidence of hepatomegaly 0, 46.4%(13/28) and 100%(9/9); the incidence of heart failure 0, 28.6%(8/28) and 44.4%(4/9); the incidence of dyspnea 0, 25.0%(7/28) and 66.7%(6/9); the incidence of hypothyroidism 0, 21.4%(6/28) and 77.8%(7/9). The incidence of hepatomegaly, dyspnea and hypothyroidism was higher in diffuse-type group with statistical significance than that in MC group ( P<0.001; P=0.017; P=0.006) and that in MU group ( P=0.004; P=0.032; P=0.004). And the incidence of hepatomegaly was higher in MU group than that in MC group ( P=0.040). Among 34 cases in multifocal-type group, 16 cases (47.1%) were observed and 18 cases (52.9%) received medical treatment or medical treatment plus interventional measures. Particularly, 6 cases (100%) in MC group were observed; 10/28 cases (35.7%) in MU group were observed and 18 cases (64.3%) received medical treatment or medical treatment plus interventional measures. Nine cases (100%) in diffuse-type group received medical treatment and 3 cases (33.3%) received medical treatment plus interventional measures. The proportion of children receiving medical treatment or medical treatment plus interventional measures in diffuse-type group was higher than those in MC/MU/multifocal-type group with statistical significance ( P=0.027; P=0.038; P<0.001). And the proportion of those receiving medical treatment or medical treatment plus interventional measures was also higher in MU group than that in MC group with statistical significance ( P=0.006). During a follow-up period of over 6 months, all children in multifocal-type group finally survived with stable conditions. However, 2 cases (22.2%) in diffuse-type group died of severe heart failure after medical treatment plus hepatic arteriovenous fistula embolization. In contrast, the rate of complete remission was 83.3%(5/6) in MC group, 50.0%(14/28) in MU group and 33.3%(3/9) in diffuse-type group. It decreased gradually. Conclusions:MU group is a subgroup of multifocal hepatic hemangioma with too-numerous-to-count lesions on transverse sections of CT/MRI. With similar clinical features to diffuse hepatic hemangioma, there may be a continuum between multifocal and diffuse hepatic hemangiomas. Timely treatment is needed.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?