Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation combined with transarterial chemoembolization versus surgical resection in the treatment for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma:a Meta-analysis

Zhi-gang CHEN,Chao-yuan HUANG,Fang LIAN,Yin-nong ZHAO,Guo-bin WU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16073/j.cnki.cjcpt.2015.01.012
2015-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE To compare the benefits of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with surgical resection (SR) in early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using meta-analysis.METtODS The potentially relevant studies comparing the efficacy and safety of RFA and TACE with SR were searched using the English databases (PubMed,Embase and Web of science)and Chinese databases (CNKI,VIP and Wanfang data).Overall survival rate(OS),Disease-free survival rate(DFS) and complications were compared and analyzed.Pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were calculated using either the fixed effects model or random-effects model.All statistic analyses were conducted using stata12.0 and Revman 4.2 from the Cochrane Collaboration.RESULTS Four case control trials were included in the meta-analysis and 697 patients were included.The results of meta-analysis showed that compared to the RFA+TACE group,5-year OS and 3,5-year DFS in SR group was obviously higher[5-year OS:OR=0.50,95%CI(0.32-0.79),P=0.003.3-year DFS:OR=0.66,95% CI(0.45-0.97),P=0.03;5-year DFS:OR=0.37,95% CI(0.19-0.72),P=0.003],but there was no significant difference in the 1,3-year OS [1-year OS,OR=1.50,95%CI(0.77-2.92),P=0.23.3-year OS,OR=0.94,95%CI(0.64-1.37),P=0.74] and 1-year disease-free survival rate [OR=1.23,95 % CI (0.79-1.90),P =0.36] between RFA + TACE and SR.RFA +TACE was associated with less complications compared with SR [OR=0.29,95 % CI(0.10,0.78),P=0.01].CONCLUSION RFA+TACE group has less major complication than SR group,but the overall efficacy of SR group is better than RFA+TACE for the management of early-stage HCCs.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?