Interventional treatmeant for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and Meta-analysis

FAN Wen-zhe,LI Jia-ping,YANG Jian-yong,WANG Yu,XIANG Xian-hong,LI He-ping
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the therapeutic effects of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus radiofrequency ablation(RFA) to TACE or RFA alone for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (UHCC). Methods All data of patients with UHCC underwent TACE+RFA versus TACE or RFA in randomized-controlled clinical trials (RCT) were collected from literature by electronic searching. Meta-analysis that recommended was done for the data of 8 researches enrolled in criteria by using RevMan 4.2 software in this study. Objects were survival and rate of complete tumor necrosis. Results TACE+RFA group had a statistically higher rate in 1-, 2-, 3-year survival compared with that of TACE group (all P<0.01). It also had a higher rate in 1-, 2-year survival than RFA group (P=0.03, P<0.01), but not in 3-year survival (P=0.16). As to the rate of complete tumor necrosis, combined therapy was better than either monotherapy (both P<0.01). Conclusions The local efficacy of TACE plus RFA for UHCC is better than either monotherapy. As to the prospective efficacy combined therapy can elevate the patients’ survival rate compared with that of TACE alone and prolong patients’ 1-, 2-year survival time compared with that of RFA alone. But there is no statistic different in 3-year patients’ survival rate when TACE plus RFA compared to RFA alone.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?