Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To explore the feasibility and safety of radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy in thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. METHODS:We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of a cohort of 147 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Seventy-one patients received traditional lymphadenectomy for the periesophageal and subcarinal lymph nodes (traditional dissection group), while 76 patients received radical lymph node dissection for the bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve lymphatic chains as well as the periesophageal and subcarinal nodes (radical dissection group). The number of retrieved lymph nodes, incidence of node metastasis, the operation time, estimated blood loss, complications, morbidity and mortality were compared between the two groups. RESULTS:Thoracoscopic esophagectomy was completed in all patients with no conversion to thoracotomy. There were no significant differences of operational time and blood loss between the two groups [(89 ± 32) min versus (99 ± 32) min, P = 0.064; (152 ± 108) ml versus (107 ± 82) ml, P = 0.261]. In all patients, the total and average number of retrieved mediastinal nodes were 1644 and 11.2 ± 5.9/case, and the incidence of metastatic lymph nodes was 24.5%. The total and average number of retrieved mediastinal nodes were 999 and 13.6 ± 6.4/case in the radical dissection group, significantly higher than that in the traditional dissection group (645 and 9.1 ± 4.4/case) (P < 0.001). The average number of retrieved nodes and node metastasis rate in the radical dissection group were significantly higher than in the traditional dissection group (13.1 ± 6.4 versus 9.1 ± 4.4, P < 0.001; 35.5% versus 12.7%, P < 0.05). In the total group of 147 cases, the metastasis rates of periesophageal, subcarinal nodes and nodes along the recurrent laryngeal nerve lymphatic chains were 19.7%, 3.4% and 17.1%, respectively. There was thoracic lymph node metastasis in 27 cases with a metastasis rate of 35.5% in the radical dissection group, significantly higher than that in 9 cases and 12.7% in the traditional dissection group (P > 0.001). In the 1644 retrieved thoracic lymph nodes, there were 90 positive metastatic lymph nodes (metastasis ratio 5.5%). Among the 1644 lymph nodes, the metastasis ratio of periesophageal lymph nodes was 6.5%, subcarinal lymph modes 2.4% and the recurrent laryngeal nerve chain lymph nodes 7.5%. Among the 147 cases, complications occurred in 60 cases, with an overall morbidity rate of 40.8%. There were no significant differences of the incidence rates of overall complications, pulmonary complications and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION:Thoracoscopic esophagectomy with radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy is technically Safe and feasible.

Efficacy of Left and Right Transthoracic Operative Approaches for Middle and Lower Esophageal Cancer

Influence of Esophageal Carcinoma Operations on Gastroesophageal Reflux.

A Comparison of Different Surgical Approaches for the Treatment of Thoracic Middle/lower Segment Esophageal Cancer

Ten-year Survivals of Right Thoracic Versus Left Thoracic Approach for Esophageal Cancer

Ten-Year Survivals of Right Thoracic vs Left Thoracic Approach for Esophageal Cancer

Extended Right Thoracic Approach Compared with Limited Left Thoracic Approach for Patients with Middle and Lower Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Three-year Survival of a Prospective, Randomized, Open-label Trial

Efficacy and Safety of Esophagectomy Via Left Thoracic Approach Versus Via Right Thoracic Approach for Middle and Lower Thoracic Esophageal Cancer: a Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial (NST1501)

Left Versus Right Approach for Middle and Lower Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

Analysis of Clinical Efficacy of Thoracoscopic Resection of Esophageal Carcinoma

Clinical Analysis of Lymphadenectomy in Patients with Esophageal Carcinoma Underwent Single Left Thoracal Incision and Cervico-Right Thoracic-Abdominal Triple Incision

Surgical Quality Determines the Long-Term Survival Superiority of Right over Left Thoracic Esophagectomy for Localized Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients: a Real-World Multicenter Study.

Analysis on 1015 Cases with Esophageal Resection for Cancer and Cervical Esophagogastrostomy

[Apico-Thoracic Retro-Aortic Anastomosis in Radical Operation for Esophageal Carcinoma].

Thoracoscopic and Laparoscopic Esophagectomy Versus Open Procedure for Early Stage Esophageal Carcinoma:Comparison of Clinical Outcomes

Application of the Anastomosis above Chest Top in Upper or Middle Esophagectomy

Efficacy and complications of endoscopic thoracoscopic versus laparoscopic radical esophagectomy in esophageal cancer treatment: A retrospective study

Comparison of 2-field lymphadenectomy with 3-field lymphadenectomy for middle third thoracic esophageal carcinomas

Thoracoscopic radical esophagectomy combined with left inferior pulmonary ligament lymphadenectomy for esophageal carcinoma via the right thoracic approach: A single-center retrospective study of 30 cases

Minimally Invasive Esophageal Resection and Intrathoracic Anastomosis for Lower Thoracic Esophageal Cancer with Single Position.

Feasibility and Safety of Radical Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy in Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer

Algorithm for converting full-parallax holograms to horizontal-parallax-only holograms.