RA02.01: COMPARISON OF THREE-FIELD VERSUS TWO-FIELD LYMPHADENECTOMY FOR THORACIC MIDDLE AND LOWER ESOPHAGEAL CANCER: POST-OPERATIVE RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Bin Li,Jiaqing Xiang,Yawei Zhang,Jie Zhang,Yihua Sun,Hong Hu,Longshegn Miao,Longfei Ma,Xiaoyang Luo,Ting Ye,Yiliang Zhang,Longlong Shao,Hang Li,Yang Zhang,Haiquan Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doy089.ra02.01
2018-01-01
Diseases of the Esophagus
Abstract:Abstract Background Patients with esophageal cancer can benefit from extended lymphadenectomy. However, the role of 3-field lymphadenectomy is unclear, and the extent of lymphadenectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer is still under discussion. Methods From June 2013 to November 2016, 400 patients with middle and lower thoracic esophageal cancer were randomly assigned to receive 3-field (3FL, n = 200) or the 2-field (2FL, n = 200) lymphadenectomy. The postoperative complications, according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, and lymph node metastasis were compared on the basis of intention-to-treat principle. Results Baseline characteristics were balanced between the 2 arms. There were 187 patients (93.5%) had squamous cell carcinoma in 3FL arm, and 192 (96.0%) in the 2FL arm, P = 0262. According to the pathological reports, T staging in the 2 arms were comparable, however more N3 patients in the 3FL arm (10.5%, 21/200) than that in the 2FL arm (10%, 5/200), P = 0040. Consequently, less TNM staging I patients in the 3FL arm (16.0%, 32/200) than that in the 2FL arm (25.5%, 51/200), P = 0.019. Operating time was significantly longer in the 3FL arm (median, 183 vs. 168 [2FL] minutes, P < 0.001). Six patients in the 3FL arm (3%, 6/200) had reintubation, whereas no reintubation in the 2 FL arm (0%, 0/200), P = 0.030. Other postoperative complications were comparable in the 2 arms. One patient in the 2-field arm died of chyloperitoneum. According to the Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications, the distribution of severity were similar between the 2 arms, P = 0.416. More lymph nodes were resected in the 3FL arm (Median, 37 vs. 24 [2FL], P < 0.001). Lymph nodes resected in the mediastinum and upper abdomen were comparable between the 2 arms. 44 patients (22%) in the 3FL arm had positive lymph nodes. Conclusion Compared with 2-field lymphadenectomy, 3-field lymphadenectomy doesn’t increase the surgical risks for patients with thoracic esophageal cancer. 3-field lymphadenectomy can be performed safely, removing unforeseen cervical positive lymph node, and offering more accurate tumor staging. Long-term survival analysis under protocol will clarify the role of 3-field lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.