Etoposide plus lobaplatin versus etoposide plus cisplatin for patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer:A Meta -analysis

Xu Li,Nan Li,Zijun Liao,Zhongrui Li,Xinhan Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-4992.2016.13.022
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate therapeutic efficacy and safety of etoposide plus lobaplatin versus etoposide plus cisplatin chemotherapy for extensive stage small cell lung cancer.Methods:We searched Web of Knowledge, PubMed,The Cochrane Library,CNKI,CBM,VIP and WanFang data base for randomized controlled trials comparing EL with EP regimens.Literatures were screened according to Cochrane Handbook 5.0.1 quality evaluation criteria. Meta -analysis was conducted with RevMan 5.2 software.Results:Four RCTs were included,involving 401 patients. The results of Meta -analyses showed that,in the aspect of efficacy,there was no significant difference between the two groups in the effective rate [ORR =1.08,95%CI(0.53 ~2.21),P =0.82].In the aspect of safety,there was significant difference between EL regimen and EP regimen in grade Ⅲ -Ⅳ nausea /vomiting [OR =0.34,95%CI (0.20 ~0.58),P <0.000 1].There were no significant difference between the two groups in the grade Ⅲ -Ⅳ neu-tropenia [OR =0.77,95%CI(0.37 ~1.63),P =0.50],grade Ⅲ -Ⅳ thrombocytopenia[OR =2.81,95%CI(0.74~10.68),P =0.13],grade Ⅲ -Ⅳ anemia [OR =0.47,95%CI(0.08 ~2.67),P =0.40].Conclusion:EL has similar efficacy to EP for extensive stage small cell lung cancer patients,but it has fewer side effects of nausea/vomi-ting.It is well tolerant.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?