Abstract:Objective To discussthe subjective effect of endoscopic assisted nasal bone reduction. Methods 40 patients with type Ⅱ nasal bone fracture were divided into two groups. Group A was control group performed by traditional open reduction. Meanwhile, group B was treated with endoscopic assisted open reduction of nasal bone. The visual analogue score of subjective symptoms were completed before and one month after operation. The subjective symptoms included nasal obstruction, nasal itching, rhinorrhea, nasal tenderness, abnormal nasal sensation and perceive nasal deviation. Dynamic changes of VAS score before and after operation of two kinds of operation were analyzed by statistical analysis to evaluate the difference between the two methods. Results There was no significant difference in the VAS scores of the two groups before surgery. On the first month follow-up, the VAS scores of the two groups were significantly different on nasal obstruction, nasal tenderness, abnormal nasal sensation and nasal deviation. However, there was no significant difference in VAS score between the group A and the group B before and after operation in two cases of and nasal itching and rhinorrhea. In thecomparison of subjective curative effect, group B was significantly better than group A. Conclusions The operation of the two methods both can achieve effective treatment of nasal fractures. The subject effect of endoscopic assisted open reduction of nasal bone is better than traditional open reduction.

Analysis of thesubjective effect of endoscopic assisted nasal bone reduction