Abstract:Background Limited evidence is available regarding the superior clinical properties of bioceramic sealers comparted with traditional standard sealers. Objectives This review aimed to answer the following research questions: 'In healthy patients requiring a root canal treatment (P), what is the efficacy of premixed bioceramic sealers (I) compared with traditional root canal epoxy resin‐based sealers (C) in terms of survival, success rates (PICO1) sealer extrusion and resorption (PICO2) post‐obturation pain (PICO3) (O)?' Methods Authors independently searched three electronic databases: PubMed (including MEDLINE), Web of Science, Embase and Scopus up to 31 October 2023. This was accompanied by both grey literature and manual search. Detailed selection criteria were applied, namely mature permanent teeth requiring root canal treatment, premixed bioceramic sealer with gutta‐percha as an intervention group, a standard filling technique as control group and full‐text available in English. A random‐effect meta‐analysis was used to synthesize the body of evidence regarding the use of bioceramic sealers in root canal treatment and their impact on post‐obturation pain. Effect sizes were represented as relative risks on a logarithmic scale for binary outcomes and as mean differences for continuous outcomes. Results A total of 941 articles were identified. Fifteen Comparative clinical studies were finally included. Eleven were randomized clinical trials, and four were prospective clinical trials with control group. The follow‐up of these studies was not greater than 2 years. No publication bias was observed in any study. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of survival and success rates. A small non‐significant lower risk of extrusion was observed for bioceramics. A small, non‐significantly lower post‐operative‐pain within 24‐h was observed when bioceramics were used. Discussion The majority of current evidence shows inconsistencies in reporting and is of short‐term duration. Robust prospective long‐term trials are needed in this area to better support future recommendations. Conclusion This systematic review is the first to analyse several clinical outcomes using premixed sealers. Included studies differed in terms of clinical protocol and operator expertise, but reported a similar outcome when comparing bioceramic versus standard sealers. Tooth survival, treatment outcome, post‐operative pain and periapical extrusion were similar and presented no significant differences between the two sealer types. Registration PROSPERO database (CRD42023449151).

The current state of physicochemical properties and biological performance researches on iRoot SP

Clinical outcome of bioceramic sealer iRoot SP extrusion in root canal treatment: a retrospective analysis

Outcome of Root Canal Treatment Using Warm Vertical Compaction with Bioceramic and Resin-Based Sealers: A Randomised Clinical Trial.

In vitro evaluation of the impact of a bioceramic root canal sealer on the mechanical properties of tooth roots

In Vitro Study of Dentinal Tubule Penetration and Filling Quality of Bioceramic Sealer

Study on the Sealing Ability of Biological Root Canal Sealer Iroot SP in Root Canal Filling

Effects of iRoot SP on osteogenic differentiation of human stem cells from apical papilla

Physicochemical Properties of a Novel Bioceramic Silicone-Based Root Canal Sealer

Effects of iRoot SP and AH Plus paste used in root canal treatment: a Meta-analysis

Cytotoxicity and cell migration evaluation of a strontium silicate-based root canal sealer on stem cells from rat apical papilla: an in vitro study

The outcome of combined use of iRoot BP Plus and iRoot SP for root-end filling in endodontic microsurgery: a randomized controlled trial

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of iRoot BP Plus as a coronal sealing material for regenerative endodontic procedures

Current Bio-based Cements and Radioactive Opacifiers in Endodontic Approaches: A Review of the Materials Used in Clinical Practice

In vitro evaluation of the sealing ability of combined use of iRoot BP Plus and iRoot SP for root-end filling

Clinical study on the effects of different root canal sealers in single visit root canal treatment

The bioceramic sealer iRoot SP promotes osteogenic differentiation of human stem cells from apical papilla via miR-141-3p/SPAG9/MAPK signalling pathway

Clinical application of calcium silicate-based bioceramics in endodontics

Biological and physico-chemical properties of new root canal sealers

[Effect of dual-wavelength laser combined with bioceramics iRoot SP to assist molar root canal treatment]

Comparative Evaluation of the Sealing Ability of a BioCeramic Sealer (iRoot SP) with AH Plus Sealer with Root Canal Dentin Using Three Different Techniques of Sealer Application: A Combined Dye Extraction and Scanning Electron Microscope Study

The efficacy of premixed bioceramic sealers versus standard sealers on root canal treatment outcome, extrusion rate and post‐obturation pain: A systematic review and meta‐analysis