Influence of abutment teeth position and adhesive point dimension on the rigidity of wire-composite splint in vitro

Yuqing Zhu,Jun Wang,Hui Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11752/j.kqcl.2015.01.04
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of abutment teeth position and adhesive point dimension on the rigidity of wire-composite splints in vitro, and to provide some theoretical basis for the choice of dental trauma splint in clinic. Methods A commercial resin artificial model was used, where teeth 11 and 21 served as injured teeth (degrees of loosening II and III), where teeth 12, 22, 13 and 23 served as abutment teeth (physiological mobility). Teeth were splinted with stainless steel wire-composite splint (0.8 mm). Grouped ac-cording to the abutment teeth position and adhesive point dimension:Group 1, 13 and 23 served as abutment teeth and adhesive point dimension was 2×2mm;Group 2 to 4 , 12 and 22 served as abutment teeth and adhesive point dimension was respectively 2×2mm,3×3mm and 4×4mm. Simulated physiological mobility was measured by universal testing machine. Results ①Tooth mobility after splinting of each group were significantly greater than physical tooth mobility. 11’s tooth mobility after splinting was 0.36-0.72mm and 21’s was 0.35-0.56mm. 11 and 21’s vertical mobility after splitting was 0.11-0.30mm.②Abutment position did not significantly affect tooth mobility after splinting.③With the adhesive point dimension increased, the horizontal tooth mobility of group 3 and group 4 after splinting was significantly decreased when compared with group 2. Conclusion The abutment teeth posi-tion did not significantly influence the splint rigidity. Adhesive point dimension could influence the horizontal tooth mobility of injured teeth after splinting, but had little effect on the vertical mobility.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?