[Subjective and Objective Clinical Outcome Assessment on Chronic Rhinosinusitis Following Endoscopic Sinus Surgery].
Ke-jun Zuo,Geng Xu,Jian-Bo Shi,Wei-Ping Wen,He-Xin Chen,Rui Xu,Li-Jing Hu,Li-Qiong Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1673-0860.2008.01.004
2008-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To assess the subjective and objective outcomes of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) following endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) and establish an assessment system of outcome with ease of application clinically. METHODS:A prospective cohort study was conducted to survey and assess the outcomes of 120 consecutive CRS patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery at 12 months after operation. The subjective and objective measures comprised symptom by visual analog scale (VAS), health-related quality of life by medical outcome study short-form 36-items (SF-36) and sino-nasal outcome test-20 (SNOT-20) scales, endoscopic appearance, mucociliary function, and histological findings. The differences of subjective and objective assessments before and after operation were compared by t-test and Chi-Square test and the correlations between the parameters above were analyzed by Spearman correlation analysis. RESULTS:At 12 months after operation, the patients' total scores by VAS, SF-36 and SNOT-20 scales improved significantly beyond the preoperative survey (P < 0.01); there were 85.96%, 77.19% and 83.33% patients with the scores respectively superior to that of preoperation, of which 72.28% subjects benefited simultaneously from these parameters; and a significant correlation was observed among them before and after operation (P < 0.01) where SNOT-20 showed a more compatibility than the other two. At 12 months after operation, the patients' total scores of endoscopic appearance, mucociliary function, and histological findings significantly improved beyond the preoperative evaluation (P < 0.05); there were 86.84% , 86.81% and 75.57% patients with the scores respectively superior to that of preoperation, of which 71.85% subjects benefited simultaneously from these parameters; and a significant correlation was observed among them before and after operation (P < 0.05) where endoscopic appearance showed a more compatibility than the other two. At 12 months after operation, 74.56% patients showed an accordant improving or worsening outcome evaluated by SNOT-20 and endoscopic appearance, while 25.44% ones represented inverse endings, of which patients with comorbidity of nasal polyps more easily demonstrated this tendency significantly (P < 0.05). No significant correlation existed between the scores of SNOT-20 and endoscopic appearances both in preoperation and in postoperation (P > 0.05), but the total scores of the anterior 10-item, excluding the posterior 10-item, of SNOT-20 inventory was found significantly correlated with the quantitative appearances on nasal endoscopy throughout (0.18 < or = 0.42, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Administration of ESS can effectively improve the outcomes of CRS patients including symptom, health-related quality of life, endoscopic appearance, mucociliary function, and histological findings. A subjectively and objectively measured assessment system with tenseness, trustiness, reasonableness, and effectiveness and with ease of application clinically is established on the basis of SNOT-20 and endoscopic appearance evaluation for outcome research.