Abstract:Objective::To compare the clinical effects of a visual virtual reality training system and a traditional method for amblyopia in children.Methods::This was a prospective, randomized, controlled study. A total of 90 children (146 eyes) from 3 years to 12 years of age underwent treatment for amblyopia for the first time. They were divided into an experimental group (45 cases, 74 eyes) and control group (45 cases, 72 eyes). Children in the experimental group had treatment with a visual virtual reality training system, and the control group had conventional integrated therapy. Visual tests were conducted every month, and a stereopsis examination was conducted after 3 months. The efficacy and safety of the visual virtual reality training method was evaluated by comparing the effects for the two groups. Data were analyzed using t test, rank sum test, Chi-square test and Fisher exact test. Results::The total effective rate for the experimental group was 87%, and was 68% for the control, and the difference was significant ( χ2=7.086, P=0.008). The results were significantly different for the patients in the 3 to 6 age group (91% vs. 74%, χ2=4.652, P=0.031). For mild amblyopia, the effective rate was 92% in experimental group, which was significantly better than the 75% in control group ( χ2=2.908, P=0.018). For anisometropic children the effective rate in the experimental group was significantly better than the rate in the control group (85% vs. 57%, χ2=3.840, P=0.045). When the effective rates for the two treatments were compared at 1, 2 and 3 months, the effective rates in the experimental group (43%, 54% and 87%) were significantly better than the rates in the control group (24%, 40% and 68%) ( χ2=6.308, P=0.012; χ2=2.779, P=0.016; χ2=7.086, P=0.008). When stereopsis was compared after 3 months, stereopsis in the experimental group (72%) was better than that in the control group (61%) ( χ2=8.214, P=0.004). Conclusions::The efficacy of visual virtual reality training is better than traditional treatment, especially for children 3 to 6 years of age and for anisometropia amblyopia. Visual virtual reality training cannot only improve visual acuity, it helps to improve stereopsis as well.

A study of amblyopia training in the treatment of 23 children with morning glory syndrome

Analysis of Clinical Features in Pediatric Morning Glory Syndrome

Analysis of the treatment of amblyopia in children

Comparison of Visual Virtual Reality Training and Traditional Treatment for Childhood Amblyopia

Analysis of treatment in children with amblyopia

Clinical analysis of combined therapy for 166 children with amblyopia

Characteristics and Predictive Factors of Visual Function Improvements after Monocular Perceptual Learning in Amblyopia.

Treatment of amblyopia emerging from plasticity of the visual cortex and binocular vision

Comprehensive treatment effect of amblyopia in children

Evaluation of Treating Mild Ametropic Amblyopia by Refractive Correction Alone

Treatment Efficiency Of Heat-Sensitive Moxibustion Affiliation In Children With Unilateral Hyperopic Anisometropic Amblyopia

Visual outcome in isoametropic amblyopic children with high hyperopia and the effect of therapy on retinal thickness

The effect of treatment on retinal microvasculature in children with unilateral amblyopia

Alternate occlusion compared to part-time occlusion for the treatment of ametropic amblyopia

Efficacy of YZH Amblyopic Therapeutic Apparatus and Nursing in Treatment of Children with Amblyopia

Congenital Cataract Operation and Preventive Treatment of Postoperative Amblyopia

The occlusion treatment of amblyopia with latent nystagmus

New treatment for amblyopia based on rules of synaptic plasticity: a randomized clinical trial

Internet-based perceptual learning in treating amblyopia

Clinical Characteristics and Treatment of 22 Eyes of Morning Glory Syndrome Associated with Persistent Hyperplastic Primary Vitreous

Perceptual Learning Improves Contrast Sensitivity and Visual Acuity in Adults with Anisometropic Amblyopia