Abstract:Objective To evaluate the effect of atropine penalization for treatment of moderate and severe anisometropic amblyopia. Methods Retrospective cohort study was performed.Eighty moderate and severe anisometropic amblyopia pediatric patients aged 4-7 years old were enrolled from December 2011 to November 2017 in Tianjin Eye Hospital and Beijing Children's Hospital.The subjects were divided into atropine penalization group and patching group according to the treatment, with 25 cases of moderate amblyopia and 15 cases of severe amblyopia in each group.The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of amblyopia in atropine penalization group and patching group before treatment, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months and 8 months after treatment were compared.The binocular visual function of each group was compared before and after treatment.The compliance and complications were also recorded.This study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki, and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tianjin Eye Hospital (2016-42) and Beijing Children's Hospital (2019-k-33). Results There were significant differences in BVCA between the two groups before and after treatment in cases with moderate amblyopia (Fgroup=3.104, P=0.032; Ftime=4.342, P=0.013); The BCVA of atropine penalization group was better than that of patching group at 2, 4, 6 and 8 months after treatment, the differences were statistically significant (all at P<0.05). There were significant differences in BCVA between the two groups before and after treatment in cases with severe amblyopia (Fgroup=3.149, P=0.016; Ftime=5.094, P=0.024); The BCVA of atropine penalization group was better than that of patching group at 2, 4, 6 and 8 months after treatment, the differences were statistically significant (all at P<0.05). The effective rates of stereopsis reconstruction in atropine penalization group were significantly higher than those in patching group in both moderate and severe amblyopia cases, and the differences were statistically significant (both at P<0.05). The compliance rate of moderate amblyopia in atropine penalization group was 96% (24/25), which was significantly higher than 76% (19/25) in patching group, the difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.153, P=0.042). The compliance rate of severe amblyopia in atropine penalization group was 100% (15/15), which was also significantly higher than 67% (10/15) in patching group, the difference was statistically significant (χ2=6.000, P=0.014). During the follow-up period, there were 4 cases with photophobia in the atropine penalization group.No adverse reaction was observed in the patching group. Conclusions Compared with patching, atropine penalization is an effective method in treatment of moderate and severe amblyopia, with the advantage in rapid improvement of visual acuity, stereopsis recovery and compliance of treatment.Atropine penalization is worthy for clinical application. Key words: Amblyopia/therapy; Anisometropic amblyopia; Atropine penalization; Patching

Alternate occlusion compared to part-time occlusion for the treatment of ametropic amblyopia

The occlusion treatment of amblyopia with latent nystagmus

Effectiveness of occlusion therapy in ametropic amblyopia aged 12-16 years old

Inverse occlusion, a binocularly motivated treatment for amblyopia

Comparison of the effectiveness of amblyopia treatment with eye-patch and binocular Occlu-tab for the same treatment duration

The Long-Term Observation in Chinese Children with Monocular Myelinated Retinal Nerve Fibers, Myopia and Amblyopia.

Alternative Flicker Glass: A New Anti-Suppression Approach to the Treatment of Anisometropic Amblyopia

Inverse Occlusion: A Binocularly Motivated Treatment for Amblyopia

Comparison of Visual Virtual Reality Training and Traditional Treatment for Childhood Amblyopia

First-dose Response of Part-Time Versus Full-Time Occlusion Therapy for the Treatment of Amblyopia in Children

Dichoptic Perceptual Training In Children With Amblyopia With Or Without Patching History

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Asymmetric Anisometropic Correction for Anisometropic Amblyopia in Children Aged 4 to 12 Years

Dichoptic Perceptual Training in Juvenile Amblyopes with or Without Patching History

Evaluation of Retinal Microcirculation Alterations Using OCTA in Hyperopic Ametropic Amblyopia Patients Before and after Treatment

Effectiveness of binocular therapy as a complementary treatment of part-time patching in older amblyopic children: a randomized clinical trial

Clinical analysis of comprehensive treatment for children's anisometropic amblyopia

Comparison of Cambridge vision stimulator (CAM) therapy with passive occlusion therapy in the management of unilateral amblyopia; a randomized clinical trial

Clinical Evaluation for Atropine Penalization in Treatment of Moderate and Severe Anisometropic Amblyopia

Objective Assessment of the Effect of Optical Treatment on Magnocellular and Parvocellular-biased Visual Response in Anisometropic Amblyopia.

Analysis of the treatment of amblyopia in children

Contrast Sensitivities of the Fellow Eyes in Children with Anisometropic and Strabismic Amblyopia