Preliminary study of three dimensional dual-phase steady state free precession imaging technique in the diagnosis of congenital heart diseases

孙爱敏,钟玉敏,王谦,王静蕾,朱铭,邵虹
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313.2014.08.003
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the value of MRI dual phase three dimensional steady state free precession (dual-phase 3D SSFP)sequence in the diagnosis of congenital heart disease (CHD).Methods:60 pediatric patients of CHD with the average heart rate as 108 beats/min underwent MRI dual-phase 3D SSFP sequence,the acquired images were at the end systolic phase and mid-late diastolic phase.The image quality and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)were analyzed and com-pared.Results:The ECG trigger delay time was 180 ~300ms [mean= (235.41 ±35.59 )ms]in systole and 384 ~550ms [m=(443.77±50.81)ms]in diastole.The image qualities of intra-cardiac structures,pulmonary veins,superior and inferior vena cava in 3D SSFP systole were significantly better than that in diastole,with statistical difference (P <0.05).However, the distinctness of aorta with no stenosis and main pulmonary artery was better in diastole compared with that of systole, yet with no statistical difference (P >0.05).The CNR of intra-cardiac structures was significantly higher in 3D SSFP systo-le than in diastole,with statistic difference (P <0.05).The CNR of SVC and IVC was higher in systole,but only the CNR of IVC showed statistical difference (P <0.05).The CNR of aorta and main pulmonary artery was lower in systole than in diastole,but there was no statistical difference (P >0.05).In patients with pulmonary stenosis and subvalvuular pulmonary stenosis,the percentage of visibility of pulmonary artery branches in systole was only 39.1%,but was higher in diastole (73.9%).Conclusion:Dual-phase 3D SSFP sequence had the advantages of showing images in systole and diastole and ulti-mately can provide more accurate diagnosis of intra-/extra-cardiac great vessel abnormalities in pediatric patients with CHD.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?