An empirical study on medical selection of lfying cadets with distant vision between PLAAF and USAF
Linsong QI,Zhikang ZOU,Qing TIAN,Caihui JIANG,Qinghong YANG,Xiang ZHANG,Tengyun WU,Meiliang HUANG,Zhongli MA
2016-01-01
Abstract:ObjectiveTo screen the virtual qualified rate of our disqualified students by the US Medical Standards Directory on distant vision and to discuss the similarities and differences of Medical Standards Directory between PLAAF and USAF.MethodsBy surveying the unqualified rates of distant vision, and the qualified rates of our unqualified cadets referring to the US Medical Standards Directory from 2013 to 2015, results were statistically analyzed. ResultsFrom 2013 to 2015, the unqualified constituent ratio of distant vision was 45.8% in 2014, which declined to 34.0% in 2015, and there was significant difference in statistics among each year (χ2=23.98,P<0.05). Upon referring to the US Medical Standards Directory, the myopia had a higher retention ratio of nearly 92.7%. There was only one retained of our unqualified cadets on hyperopia.ConclusionThe US Medical Standards Directory is broad, specific, reasonable, and has a detailed description of refractive surgery. We suggest that we still should take a strict quality control on distant vision, and if we have put mature corneal refractive surgery technology into our medical standard, then we might broaden our Medical Standards Directory on distant vision gradually.