Hypertension and its relative risk factors in Chinese physicians — Blood pressure control of Chinese physicians and measurement of key treatment goals (benchmark study)

zhiyi ma,ningling sun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.08.603
IF: 4.039
2011-01-01
International Journal of Cardiology
Abstract:Objective: This study aimed to make a cross-sectional survey on hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus and other cardiovascular risk factors in Chinese physicians and their cognition condition on hypertension diagnosis. Methods: From January 1st to December 15th in 2010, the physicians from fifty-four hospitals of 11 provinces in China were included in our study. They were internists and surgeons. Results: There were 11,249 physicians who finished our survey, including 10,247 internists and 1002 surgeons. The average age of internists was 39.1±6.8 years old and the average age of surgeons was 39.3±6.9 years old. 53.80% of internists and 63.47% of surgeons had high normal blood pressure. 18.45% internists and 12.67% surgeons had hypertension history. Among these physicians who had hypertension history, there were 83.08% of internists and 76.38% of surgeons whose blood pressure was still higher than 140/90 mmHg. According to body mass index, 31.53% of internists and 25.95% of surgeons were overweight or obese. The smoking rate was higher in surgeons (18.11%) than in internists (12.75%). There were 13.90% internists and 3.21% surgeons who had hyperlipidemia history. There were 3.79% internists and 1.48% surgeons who had the history of diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance. There were 10.50% internal doctors and 11.98% surgeon doctors who gave the wrong answers to the diagnosis standard for hypertension. Conclusion: Even for Chinese physicians, the control rate of hypertension was still low. It seemed that there were more internists who had the cardiovascular risk factors than surgeons. There were quite a few physicians who had the misunderstanding on the diagnosis standard of hypertension.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?