CTimagingfeaturesanddifferentialdiagnosisofhilarcholangiocarcinomawithdifferentgrossclassification

Qun ZHOU,Liang MAO,Yudong QIU,Jun CHEN,Bin ZHU,Jian HE
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-1671.2019.05.020
2019-01-01
Abstract:Objective TodiscusstheCTimagingfeaturesanddifferentialdiagnosisofhilarcholangiocarcinomawithdifferent grossclassifications.Methods 83casesofperihilardiseasesconfirmedbyhistopathologywereanalyzedretrospectivelybytworadiologists. CTimagingfeaturesandenhancementpatternsinhilarcholangiocarcinomawithdifferentgrossclassificationsandotherperihilarbenign diseaseswerecomparedtoseeiftherewasasignificantdifference.Results Ofall,15caseswithintraductalgrowinghilarcholangiocarcinoma, theaxialdiametersweresignificantlylargerthanperihilarbenigndiseases,andallofthem werewash-inandwash-outpatternof enhancement.38caseswereperiductalinfiltratinghilarcholangiocarcinomawithsignificantlyshorterlongitudinallength,mostlywith biliarystricture,bileductthicknessandsoftrattandistantbiliarydilatation.Mostofthem werewash-inandwash-outpatternof enhancement.30casesweremass-forminglesions.Hilarmass-forminglesionsweremostlyhilarcholangiocarcinoma,andtheenhancement patternswerepersistentandprogressiveenhancements.Conclusion Differentgrossclassificationsofhilarcholangiocarcinomahave differentCTfeatures,includingthesize,morphology,indirectsignsandenhancementpatterns,whichcanbeusedtodistinguishwith thehilarbenignlesions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?