Effects and safety of peronosetron to prevent nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic radical resection combined with sustained-release fluorouracil implantation in low rectal cancer

Kun YAN,Wei CHENG,Gang CAO,Xin XU,Zhi-liang WANG,Jie LI,Yi-ming LI,Zong-zheng JI
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14109/j.cnki.xyylc.2019.04.007
2019-01-01
Abstract:AIM To observe the efficacy and safety of palonosetron in the treatment of nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic radical operation combined with sustained-release fluorouracil implantation for low anus-preserving rectal cancer. METHODS A total of 200 patients with advanced rectal cancer were randomly divided into palonosetron group and tropisetron group, 100 cases in each group. Both groups were treated with laparoscopic radical resection of low anus-preserving rectal cancer combined with sustained-release fluorouracil implantation. The patients in the palonosetron group were treated with palonosetron (0.25 mg, iv) 30 min before operation, while the tropisetron group were treated with tropisetron (5 mg, iv) at the same time. The occurrence of nausea and vomiting within 3 days after operation was recorded, and the occurrence of adverse reactions was observed. RESULTS The incidence of nausea in the palonosetron group and the tropisetron group was (31% vs. 46%) and (31% vs. 48%) at the first day and within 3 days after operation. The preventive of nausea in the palonosetron group was significantly better than that in the tropisetron group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of nausea and vomiting between the two groups at the second day (P> 0.05). There was no significant difference in adverse reactions of headache, constipation and abdominal distension between the two groups (P> 0.05), but the incidence of vertigo in the palonosetron group was lower than that in the tropisetron group (7% vs. 17%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Palonosetron is superior to tropisetron in terms of preventing nausea after laparoscopic radical operation for low anus-preserving rectal cancer combined with sustained-release fluorouracil implantation, and it is safety.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?