Abstract:Background: Despite significant progress in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) by using dexamethasone combined with palonosetron for patients who received moderate-emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC), some of these patients still suffer from CINV. We evaluated whether aprepitant combined with palonosetron can improve the efficacy in the prevention of CINV in patients receiving MEC. Methods: This was a single-centre, open-label, phase III, randomized controlled trial, which was done at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University of China. The registered patients planned to receive mFOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil) but had not received any chemotherapy previously. The patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the aprepitant group (aprepitant 125 mg orally on day 1, 80 mg on day 2-3) and the dexamethasone group (dexamethasone 10 mg intravenously on day 1, 5 mg on days 2 and 3), both groups with palonosetron 0.25 mg intravenously on day 1. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved a complete response (CR), defined as the absence of vomiting and no use of rescue medications in the overall phase (0-120 h). The primary outcome and safety were assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population, which excluded all patients who used estazolam within 24 h before registration and those who refused to keep a diary documenting the severity of nausea, frequency of vomiting, and the use of rescue therapy. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02909478. Findings: Between Sep 1, 2017, and Oct 23, 2019, 320 patients were enrolled, and 315 patients were evaluated. The proportion of patients who achieved CR was significantly higher with aprepitant than that noted with dexamethasone in the overall phase (88.8% vs. 74.2%; P = 0.0010; rate difference, RD 15%, 95% CI, 6% to 23%) and in the delayed phase (25-120 h), 90.6% vs. 75.5%, (P < 0.0001; RD 15%, 95%CI, 7% to 23%). No significant difference of CR rate was observed in the acute phase (0-24 h), 93.8% vs. 93.5%, (P = 0.94; RD 0%, 95% CI, -5% to 6%)). In the overall phase, the incidence of insomnia (P < 0.0010), dyspepsia (P = 0.038), and flushing (P = 0.0010) reported by the patients was significantly higher in the dexamethasone group than that in the aprepitant group. Interpretation: Aprepitant combined with palonosetron is superior to dexamethasone combined with palonosetron in patients who received the MEC regimen mFOLFOX6 in terms of preventing CINV. Funding: The National Key R&D Program of China (2019YFC1316000) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81974369).

Comparative efficacy and safety of palonosetron with the first 5-HT3 receptor antagonists for the chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: A meta-analysis

The Effect of Palonosetron Hydrochloride in the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Moderate and Severe Nausea and Vomiting

Comparison of antienetic efficacy between palonosetron and ondansetron in patients treated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy

Randomized, double-blind, crossover study of palonosetron compared with granisetron for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in a Chinese population

Effect of Palonosetron in Preventing Chemotherapy-Induced Vomiting

A Clinical Study of Palonosetron in Prevention of Chemotherapy-related Nausea and Vomiting in Patients with Breast Cancer

Applying palonosetron to prevent nausea and vomiting caused by chemotherapy with nimustine in brain glioma patients

Preventive Effect of Smecta on Delayed Emesis Induced by High Dose Cisplatin Chemotherapy:A Randomized Cross over Study

Comparison of netupitant/palonosetron with 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist in preventing of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Comparative effectiveness of netupitant-palonosetron plus dexamethasone versus aprepitant-based regimens in mitigating chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

A Randomized Trial of Ondansetron Combined with Methyprednisolone for Prevention of Emesis Induced by Chemotherapy

Comparison of granisetron and palonosetron in triplet anti-emetic prophylaxis in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving cisplatin-based highly emetogenic chemotherapy

Aprepitant plus palonosetron versus dexamethasone plus palonosetron in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with moderate-emetogenic chemotherapy: A randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial

Comparison of Tropisetron Versus Tropisetron Plus Methylprednisolone in Prevention of Chemotherapy Induced Emesis

Safety and Efficacy of Aprepitant As Mono and Combination Therapy for the Prevention of Emetogenic Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Post-Marketing Surveillance in China.

[A Meta-Analysis of Aprepitant for Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting].

Comparison of efficacy between palonosetron-midazolam combination and palonosetron alone for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing breast surgery and patient controlled analgesia: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study: A CONSORT-compliant study

Single-dose Tropisetron for prevention of Cisplatin-induced emesis

Comparison of different administration methods of aprepitant and tropisetron in preventing vomiting induced by cisplatin chemotherapy in treatment of advanced lung cancer

Phase III Randomized Trial of Palonosetron and Dexamethasone with or Without Aprepitant to Prevent Nausea and Vomiting Induced by Full-dose Single-day Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy in Lung Cancer

Efficacy Of Olanzapine For The Prophylaxis Of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea And Vomiting: A Meta-Analysis