Comparison of the clinical value of MRI classification system of deep gray matter injury in children with cerebral palsy

Heng LIU,Miao-miao WANG,Xiao-yu WANG,Hui-fang ZHAO,Liang WU,Hao-xiang JIANG,Cong-cong LIU,Xian-jun LI,Chao JIN,Qin-li SUN,Jing-wei MA,Hui WANG,Jian YANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7652/jdyxb201802004
2018-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the reliability of MRI classification and clinical significance of deep gray matter injury(DGMI)in children with cerebral palsy(CP).Methods We made a retrospective assessment of 14 children with gross motor function classification system(GMFCS),manual ability classification system(MACS)and MRI classification system of deep gray matter injury.Based on T2WI,two radiologists worked independently and graded MRI pictures according to three-grading system and four-grading system.To evaluate the reliability of different grading systems,intra-observer and inter-observer agreements were tested by Kappa test.Spearman correlation analysis was performed to analyze the MRI classification system with GMFCS and MACS.Results The Kappa value of the intro-observer and inter-observe agreement of three-grading system was 0.873 and 0.873,respectively (P<0.001).The Kappa value of the intro-observer and inter-observe agreement of four-grading system was 0.901 and 0.611(P<0.001).Three-grading system had no significant correlation with GMFCS(r=0.053,P>0.05)or MACS(r=0.128,P>0.05).Four-grading system had a significant positive correlation with GMFCS(r=0.605, P<0.05)and MACS(r=0.779,P<0.05).Conclusion In the two grading systems,four-grading system is a more repeatable approach for detecting deep gray matter,gross motor function and manual function injuries in children with cerebral palsy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?