A Comparison Between Small Incision at the Third Intercostal Space and Conventional Mid-sternal Incision Surgery for Multiple Valvular Diseases
赵东,朱仕杰,张致琦,王春生
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2015.01.002
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of minimally invasive cardiac surgery through small incision at the third intercostal space for multiple valvular diseases. Methods From April 2013 to April 2014, a total of 23 patients with multiple valvular diseases underwent cardiac surgery through small incision at the third intercostal space.Another group of 23 patients receiving conventional mid-sternal incision surgery during the same period were selected as the control group.The time of operation, time of cardiopulmonary bypass( CPB) , time of aortic cross clamp, days in ICU, days before discharge, transfusional rate, blood transfusion, postoperative pain, and postoperative satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results The minimally invasive group showed significantly better results in days in ICU, days before discharge, postoperative drainage amount, postoperative pain, and postoperative satisfaction than the control group [(40.4 ±7.1) h vs.(48.8 ±8.3) h, t=-3.713, P=0.001;6 d (5-7 d) vs. 9 d (8-14 d), Z=-5.927, P=0.000;(479.6 ±81.2) ml vs.(855.7 ±114.7) ml, t=-12.820, P=0.000; (5.1 ±0.9) points vs.(6.2 ±0.7) points, t=-4.828, P=0.000; (9.2 ±0.4) points vs.(7.1 ±0.8) points, t=10.908, P=0.000]. However, the minimally invasive group showed longer time of operation, time of CPB, and time of aortic cross clamp than the control group [(4.64 ±0.47) h vs.(4.15 ±0.45) h, t=3.626, P=0.001;129 min (113-153 min) vs.101 min (85-133 min), Z=-4.572, P=0.000;(87.4 ±13.6) min vs.(71.6 ±13.0) min, t=4.036, P=0.000].In the minimally invasive group, the EF was significantly lower at 1 month postoperatively than the control group (55.7%±5.3% vs.59.4%±4.6%, t=-2.525, P=0.015) . Conclusion As compared with conventional mid-sternal incision surgery, cardiac surgery through small incision at the third intercostal space bears advantages in the treatment of multiple valvular diseases, being a safe and reliable procedure with great promises.