Invasive Strategy in Patients with Bilateral Renal Artery Stenosis

NI Jun,SHEN Wei-feng,ZHANG Rui-yan,HU Jian,ZHANG Xian,ZHENG Ai-fang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2005.08.011
2005-01-01
Abstract:Objective To determine the invasive strategy for patients with bilateral renal atery stenosis (BRAS). Methods Among 46 consecutive patients with severe bilateral renal artery stenosis (BRAS) ( luminal narrowing 70%)undergoing renal artery stenting, 16 patients were treated with bilateral renal stenting (group I), while the 30 remaining patients received unilateral stent implantation for the more stentic renal artery (group II). The successful rates of the both groups were recorded and the outcomes during follow-up were compared. Results The average dose of contrast medium was significantly higher in group I than in group II, (135.4±9.1) mL vs. (97.5±10.5) mL(P0.05). However, the incidence of contrast nephropathy was similar in both groups. During follow-up, group I patients tended to have more renal failure, re-admission and deaths than those in group II, but it did not reach significantly statistical level. The rate of improvement of hypertension was also similar in both groups. Conclusion The strategy of implantation one stent in the more severe side of BRAS appears to be better than renal stenting in both sides.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?