Effects of Different Panels of Antibodies and Permeabilizations on Detection of Intracellular Antigens

蒋黎敏,徐翀,李莉,沈立松
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2004.09.020
2004-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore the effect of different panels of antibodies and permeabilizations on detection of intracellular antigens. Methods Using direct single-color staining method with a FACSCalibur flow cytometer, we evaluated the expression of intracellular antigens using different panels of antibodies and permeabilizations. Results The B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia( B-ALL) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cases were found to be false positive for CD3 ( Becton Dickinson) and negative for CD3 ( Immunotech) . The B-ALL and T-ALL cases were found to be false positive for MPO ( Immunotech) and negative for MPO ( Becton Dickinson) by using 8E , whereas no positive results were observed by using the other three permeabilization techniques, respectively. Using FACS permeabiliza-tion solution (PS) , it was shown that CD22 (Immunotech) was false negative in B-ALL and in healthy controlx. These findings were in contrast with the results obtained using IntraPrep, FixPerm and 8E , which showed positive results. The AML and T-ALL cases were found to be false positive for CD22 (Immunotech) by using 8E , whereas no positive results were observed by using the other three permeabilization techniques, respectively. Conclusion Results may be affected significantly using different panels of antibodies and permeabilizations in detection of intracellular antigens in leukemia cells with flow cytometry, which may lead to misdiagnosis of patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?