Abstract:AIM:To observe and compare clinical effects of coaxial 1. 8mm microincision phacoemulsification and 3. 2mm small incision phacoemulsification. <br> ●METHODS:A total of 117 eyes of 85 patients with age-related cataract in our hospital were divided randomly into two groups:43 patients (59 eyes) in the coaxial 1. 8 mm microincision cataract surgery group ( C - MlCS ) , 42 patients (58 eyes) in the coaxial 3. 2 mm traditional small incision cataract surgery group (C-SlCS). A total of 117 eyes were received phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation. Uncorrected visual acuity was recorded preoperatively and postoperatively at 1, 7, 30 and 90d. The effective phacoemulsification time and average ultrasound energy were recorded in surgery. Corneal endothelial cell and corneal topography were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively at 90 d. <br> ●RESULTS:Uncorrected visual acuity ( logMAR) was no overall statistical significance difference between C-MlCS group and C-SlCS group (P>0. 05), but was significant statistical difference in different time-point within both groups(P<0. 05). Uncorrected visual acuity in different time-point had nothing to do with corneal wound size in cataract surgery(P>0. 05). On the 1 day after surgery, uncorrected visual acuity was 0. 16±0. 11 in C-MlCS group and 0. 22±0. 18 in C-SlCS group(P<0. 05). AVE was (7. 00± 2.72)% in C-MlCS group and (6. 16±3. 16)% in C-SlCS group (P>0. 05). EPT was (3. 09±1. 61)s in C-MlCS group and (3. 20±1. 92)s in C-SlCS group (P>0. 05). At 90 d after surgery, corneal endothelial cell loss percentage was (5. 81±2. 28)% in C-MlCS group and (5. 69±2. 38)% in C-SlCS group (P>0.05), SlA was (0.35±0.11) Din C-MlCS group and (0. 61±0. 13) D in C-SlCS group (P<0. 05). <br> ● CONCLUSION: Compared with coaxial 3. 2mm traditional small incision cataract surgery, 1. 8mm coaxial microincision cataract surgery can get earlier visual rehabilitation and significantly reduce SlA. The coaxial 1. 8mm microincision cataract surgery is safe, effective and deserves further clinical applications.

Microflow-Plus-Tip in Phacoemulsification

Fusion Phaco Complex Phacoemulsification Through A Coaxial 2.2 Mm Micro-Incision: A Clinical Study

Would micro-incision phacoemulsification be a new trend of cataract surgery]

Femtosecond laser combined with non-chopping rotation phacoemulsification technique for soft-nucleus cataract surgery: a prospective study

Examination of phacoemulsification tips after different numbers of cataract surgeries

A Comparison Of Surgical Efficacy Between A 1.8-Mm Microincision And 3.2-Mm And 5.5-Mm Incisions For Phacoemulsification

A Comparative Study of Non-Chopping Rotation and Axial Rotation Versus Quick Chop Phacoemulsification Techniques

Comparisons of the energy efficiency and intraocular safety of two torsional phacoemulsification tips

Bevel-down Phaco Chop in Phacoemulsification

Phacoemulsification in High Myopia with Cataract

A Preliminary Report on Bimanual Microphacoemulsification

New phacoemulsification tip with a grooved, threaded-tip construction

Update on Microincisional Phacoemulsification

[Surgical experience with microcoaxial phacoemulsification]

Analysis of the visual quality after bimanual phacoemulsification via micro-incision

Comparison of Bimanual and Micro‐coaxial Phacoemulsification with Torsional Ultrasound

Clinical efficiency of slow motion phacoemulsification in treatment of patients with cataract and lens subluxation

Clinical Evaluation Using Custom Control Software Technology in Coaxial Phacoemulsification

Analysis and Settlement: the Difficult Points of Complicated Cataract Phacoemulsification

Torsional Ultrasound Modality For Hard Nucleus Phacoemulsification Cataract Extraction

Clinical effects of coaxial 1 . 8 mm microincision phacoemulsification