Examination of phacoemulsification tips after different numbers of cataract surgeries

Agnes Revak,Gabor Nemeth,Judit Korizs,Gergo Gyulai,Agnes Abraham,Eva Kiss,Zoltan Sohajda
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-67891-0
IF: 4.6
2024-07-25
Scientific Reports
Abstract:To compare unused phacoemulsification tips and those used different times with different techniques of cataract surgery (divide and conquer and chop), in vivo phacoemulsifications were performed with tips of different numbers of operation. These were compared with the same number of sterilized-only and unused tips with the help of an atomic force microscope. Comparison of roughness values (Sa, Sq), geometric and measurable flange length and surface was also performed (profile length %, area %). The differences between the parameters that can be measured during surgery (average ultrasound percentage, US ave %, Average Phaco Time, APT) were also analyzed. We found significant correlations between age and lens hardness (p = 0.0045), area % and APT (p = 0.03), between area % and US ave% (p = 0.03) and also between the two surgical techniques in terms of area% (p = 0.04) and US ave % (p < 0.01). Roughness increased with the number of uses. An increase in profile length% can be observed up to the twentieth operation. This can result from scratches and microscopic damages and also from abrasion and possible material additions on the surface of the needles. The divide and conquer technique causes less microscopic damage to the surface, and smaller average US energy is required during surgery.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?