Abstract:Background: Patients with kidney failure require vascular access to receive maintenance haemodialysis (HD), which can be achieved by an arteriovenous fistula or a central venous catheter (CVC). CVC use is related to frequent complications such as venous stenosis and infection. Venous stenosis occurs mainly due to trauma caused by the entrance of the catheter into the venous lumen and repeated contact with the vein wall. A biofilm, a colony of irreversible adherent and self-sufficient micro-organisms embedded in a self-produced matrix of exopolysaccharides, is associated with the development of infections in patients with indwelling catheters. Despite its clinical relevance, the treatment of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) in patients receiving maintenance HD remains controversial, especially regarding catheter management. Antibiotic lock solutions may sterilise the catheter, treat the infection and prevent unnecessary catheter procedures. However, such treatment may also lead to antibiotic resistance or even clinical worsening in certain more virulent pathogens. Catheter removal and delayed replacement may remove the source of infection, improving infectious outcomes, but this approach may also increase vascular access stenosis, thrombosis or both, or even central vein access failure. Catheter guidewire exchange attempts to remove the source of infection while maintaining access to the same vein and, therefore, may improve clinical outcomes and preserve central veins for future access. Objectives: To assess the benefits and harms of different interventions for CRBSI treatment in patients receiving maintenance HD through a permanent CVC, such as systemic antibiotics alone or systemic antibiotics combined with either lock solutions or catheter guidewire exchange or catheter replacement. Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 21 December 2021 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register were identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Selection criteria: We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs evaluating the management of CRBSI in permanent CVCs in people receiving maintenance HD. Data collection and analysis: Two authors independently selected studies for inclusion, assessed their risk of bias, and performed data extraction. Results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) or hazard ratios (HR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes, with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). The certainty of the evidence was assessed using GRADE. Main results: We identified two RCTs and one quasi-RCT that enrolled 760 participants addressing the treatment of CRBSIs in people (children and adults) receiving maintenance HD through CVC. No two studies compared the same interventions. The quasi-RCT compared two different lock solutions (tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) and heparin) with concurrent systemic antibiotics. One RCT compared systemic antibiotics alone and in association with an ethanol lock solution, and the other compared systemic antibiotics with different catheter management strategies (guidewire exchange versus removal and replacement). The overall certainty of the evidence was downgraded due to the small number of participants, high risk of bias in many domains, especially randomisation, allocation, and other sources of bias, and missing outcome data. It is uncertain whether an ethanol lock solution used with concurrent systemic antibiotics improved CRBSI eradication compared to systemic antibiotics alone (RR 1.61, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.23) because the certainty of this evidence is very low. There were no reported differences between the effects of TPA and heparin lock solutions on cure rates (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.15) or between catheter guidewire exchange versus catheter removal with delayed replacement, expressed as catheter infection-free survival (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.79). To date, no results are available comparing other interventions. Outcomes such as venous stenosis and/or thrombosis, antibiotic resistance, death, and adverse events were not reported. Authors' conclusions: Currently, there is no available high certainty evidence to support one treatment over another for CRBSIs. The benefit of using ethanol lock treatment in combination with systemic antibiotics compared to systemic antibiotics alone for CRBSIs in patients receiving maintenance HD remains uncertain due to the very low certainty of the evidence. Hence, further RCTs to identify the benefits and harms of CRBSI treatment options are needed. Future studies should unify CRBSI and cure definitions and improve methodological design.

Application of 70 ％ ethanol lock for tunnel cuffed catheter in maintenance hemodialysis patients

Successful Prevention of Cuffed Hemodialysis Catheter-Related Infection Using an Antibiotic Lock Technique by Strictly Catheter-Restricted Antibiotic Lock Solution Method.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Lock Solutions for the Prevention of Catheter-Related Complications Including Infectious and Bleeding Events in Adult Haemodialysis Patients: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Lock Solutions for the Prevention of Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Prevention of catheter-related bacteremia with a daily ethanol lock in patients with tunnelled catheters: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Ethanol Locks for the Prevention of Catheter-Related Infection in Patients with Central Venous Catheter: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Ethanol locks for the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials

Efficacy of the lock solution containing gentamicin and heparin for the treatment of long-term dialysis catheter related bloodstream infections

Comparison of the clinical effects between catheter exchange methods in geriatric patients with tunneled cuffed hemodialysis catheters

Citrate Versus Heparin Lock for Prevention of Hemodialysis Catheter-Related Complications: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Citrate Versus Heparin Lock for Hemodialysis Catheters: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Heparin Lock Concentration of Hemodialysis Intra-Jugular Vein Dual Lumen Catheter

Anticoagulant Therapies Versus Heparin for the Prevention of Hemodialysis Catheter-Related Complications: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Randomized Controlled Trials.

#3349 METICULOUS CATHETER CARE CAN REDUCE CATHETER-RELATED BLOODSTREAM INFECTIONS SIGNIFICANTLY IN HAEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS – A 5-YEAR SINGLE CENTRE STUDY

Low-dose Versus High-Dose Heparin Locks for Hemodialysis Catheters: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Interventions for treating catheter-related bloodstream infections in people receiving maintenance haemodialysis

A Prospective Controlled Trial on Prophylactic Efficacy of Cefazoline Lock Solution for Catheter-Related Infection in Hemodialysis Patients

Effects of Ethanol Lock Therapy on Central Line Infections and Mechanical Problems in Children With Intestinal Failure

Ethanol Lock Technique: Review of the Literature

The CLOCK trial, a double-blinded randomized controlled trial: Trisodium citrate 30% and minocycline 3 mg/mL plus EDTA 30 mg/mL are effective and safe for catheter patency maintenance among CKD 5D patients on hemodialysis

Does antimicrobial lock solution reduce catheter-related infections in hemodialysis patients with central venous catheters? A Bayesian network meta-analysis