Abstract:PurposeTo determine if prophylactic antibiotic use lowers the incidence of infection in the first week following tunneled dialysis catheter exchange.Materials and MethodsOur 28 ambulatory surgery centers performed dialysis catheter exchanges for poorly functiong catheters. Some physicians give prophylactic antibiotics and some do not. Initiated as part of our QA program, and an MOC project, we evaulated each patient's outcome one week after their procedure. Data recorded when the procedures were performed included presence of preexisting infection, use of antibiotic, antibiotic type, route of administration, and timing of administration. Follow-up phone calls scheduled 6-8 days after intervention, were made to each patient's dialysis center to determine the presence of the following complications: infection, bleeding, nausea/vomiting, respiratory difficulty, and pain. This information was enteried into a central database. The QA/MOC team assessed the data. A WIRB exemption was obtained for publication of a retrospective analysis of the database from 1/1/2010 through 12/31/2011. All patient identifiers were removed and the database was submitted for statistical analysis. Only patients without preexisting infection were included in the analysis.ResultsThere was a significant decrease in the rate of infection in patients who received IV antibiotics, primarily cefazolin 1gm, given pre-procedure or intraprocedure just prior to the intervention. Oral antibiotics given peri-procedure did not decrease infection rates. There was no significant difference in other rates of complications between those who did and did not receive antibiotics.ConclusionIntravenous cefazolin given prophylactically just prior to tunneled dialysis catheter exchange significantly reduces the rate of infection at one week. Table 1 To determine if prophylactic antibiotic use lowers the incidence of infection in the first week following tunneled dialysis catheter exchange. Our 28 ambulatory surgery centers performed dialysis catheter exchanges for poorly functiong catheters. Some physicians give prophylactic antibiotics and some do not. Initiated as part of our QA program, and an MOC project, we evaulated each patient's outcome one week after their procedure. Data recorded when the procedures were performed included presence of preexisting infection, use of antibiotic, antibiotic type, route of administration, and timing of administration. Follow-up phone calls scheduled 6-8 days after intervention, were made to each patient's dialysis center to determine the presence of the following complications: infection, bleeding, nausea/vomiting, respiratory difficulty, and pain. This information was enteried into a central database. The QA/MOC team assessed the data. A WIRB exemption was obtained for publication of a retrospective analysis of the database from 1/1/2010 through 12/31/2011. All patient identifiers were removed and the database was submitted for statistical analysis. Only patients without preexisting infection were included in the analysis. There was a significant decrease in the rate of infection in patients who received IV antibiotics, primarily cefazolin 1gm, given pre-procedure or intraprocedure just prior to the intervention. Oral antibiotics given peri-procedure did not decrease infection rates. There was no significant difference in other rates of complications between those who did and did not receive antibiotics. Intravenous cefazolin given prophylactically just prior to tunneled dialysis catheter exchange significantly reduces the rate of infection at one week. Table 1

Comparison of the clinical effects between catheter exchange methods in geriatric patients with tunneled cuffed hemodialysis catheters

The Design and Clinical Application of a New Type of Disposable Heparin Free Dialysis Tube

Successful Prevention of Cuffed Hemodialysis Catheter-Related Infection Using an Antibiotic Lock Technique by Strictly Catheter-Restricted Antibiotic Lock Solution Method.

Application of Long-Term Cuffed Catheter in Patients with Chronic Hemodialysis

A Modified Switching Procedure from Temporary to Tunneled Central Venous Dialysis Catheters

Evaluating Short-Term Outcomes of Tunneled and Non-Tunneled Central Venous Catheters in Hemodialysis

[Complications Related to Permanent Deep Venous Catheterization Using Dual Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter].

Solutions to Stuck Tunneled Cuffed Catheters in Patients Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis

Application of Cuffed-Tunneled Femoral and Internal Jugular Vein Catheters in Hemodialysis

Comparative study between the halfway technique and the standard technique for exchange of tunneled hemodialysis catheter

Catheter failure and mortality in hemodialysis patients with the tunneled-cuffed catheter tip positioned in the inferior vena cava

Characteristics of Vascular Access in the Elderly Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis

NUMBER OF DAILY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS EXCHANGES AND MORTALITY RISK IN A CHINESE POPULATION.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Lock Solutions for the Prevention of Catheter-Related Complications Including Infectious and Bleeding Events in Adult Haemodialysis Patients: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Prophylactic Antibioitic Use During Dialysis Catheter Exchange

Tunneled Dialysis Catheter Exchange Through Fibrin Sheath Crevice Vs in Situ Catheter Exchange for the Treatment of Catheter Dysfunction.

Vascular access type and prognosis in elderly hemodialysis patients: a propensity-score-matched study

Reinsertion of tunneled-cuffed catheter in hemodialysis patients with catheter loss and limited access options

Re-hospital admission, morbidity and mortality rate in patients undergoing tunnelled catheter implantation for haemodialysis

Comparison of different antithrombotic agents in the prevention the dysfunction of cuffed catheter

Infectious Complications of Temporary Haemodialysis Catheters