Effects of different cryoprotectants and cooling methods on the histology and immunogenicity of heart valves

Yanjie GONG,Long WANG,Laidong DONG,Dong LI,Guangmin SONG,Xiuli JU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2015.1185
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore the proper cryoprotectants and cooling methods for storing heart valves in liquid nitro-gen.Methods Each heart valve from 6 healthy donors were divided into 7 specimens:1 was observed and tested di-rectly as control group,and other 6 were divided into 3 cryoprotectant groups (Group A,B and C),with 2 specimens in each groups.Two cooling methods were applied,including -80 ℃ direct cooling (G1 groups)and programmed cooling (G2 groups).The histological changes were observed with hematoxylin-eosin staining,Weigert-Van Gieson (ET +VG)staining,and Masson Trichrome staining.The ultrastructural changes were observed with transmission elec-tron microscopy (TEM).The expression of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)was detected with Western blotting and immunohistochemistry.The immunogenicity of each group was compared.Results Cryopreservation injured the or-ganizational structure of valves,while valves stored in DMSO and chondroitin sulfate sodium showed the least lesions and obviously down-regulated expression of HLA-I.Collagen fibrils were less stained,while the orientation was more disorderly in the programmed cooling groups than in the -80 ℃direct cooling groups,but the expression of HLA-I was lower.Conclusion DMSO in combination with chondroitin sulfate sodium can best preserve the heart valves,with the lowest immunogenicity.The method of -80 ℃direct cooling is conducive for the preservation of collagen fibrils,but it produces higher immunogenicity than programmed cooling.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?