Protective effects of 10°C preservation on donor lungs with lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury

Keiji Yamanashi,Aizhou Wang,Catherine A Bellissimo,Gabriel Siebiger,Paolo Oliveira,Yu Zhang,Juan Montagne,Guillermo Garza,Nadav Furie,Prodipto Pal,Mingyao Liu,Ewan C Goligher,Shaf Keshavjee,Marcelo Cypel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.09.022
2024-09-23
Abstract:Objectives: Hypothermic lung preservation at 10°C has recently shown to enhance quality of healthy donor lungs during ischemia. This study aims to show generalizability of the 10°C lung preservation using an endotoxin-induced lung injury with specific focus on the benefits of post-transplant lung function and mitochondrial preservation. Methods: Lipopolysaccharide (3 mg/kg) was injected intratracheally in rats to induce lung injury. Injured lungs were flushed with preservation solution and allocated to 3 groups (n = 6 each): minimum cold storage, 6-hour storage on ice (Ice), and 6-hour storage at 10°C (10C). Left lungs were transplanted and reperfused for 2 hours. After storage, lung tissue was used to evaluate the effects of hypothermic storage on the mitochondrial function: mitochondrial membrane potential was assessed by JC-1 staining; mitochondrial oxygen consumption was assessed using high resolution respirometry. Results: Two hours after reperfusion, the PO2/FiO2 ratio from the graft was significantly higher in the 10C group than in the Ice group (P = 0.015), while the wet-to-dry weight ratio was significantly lower (P = 0.041). Levels of interleukin-8 in lung tissues were significantly lower in the 10C group than in the Ice group (P = 0.004). Mechanistically, we noted higher mitochondrial membrane potential and elevated state III respiration in the 10C group than in the Ice group (P = 0.015 and P = 0.002, respectively), implying higher metabolic activities may be maintained during 10°C preservation. Conclusions: Favorable metabolism during 10°C preservation prevented ischemia-induced mitochondrial damages in injured lungs, leading to better post-transplant outcomes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?