An Evaluation of the Role of Various Treatments for Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma

陈诗奉,江跃全,黄绍生
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0253-3626.2002.03.027
2002-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To compare the therapeutic effect of the three types of the treatment for advanced esophageal carcinoma. Methods: 92 patients (78 men and 14 women) were involved in this study. Patients were divided into three groups. Group A (n=16) gastrostomy, group B (n=27) esophageal stent implanted, group C (n= 49) esophagectomy . A comparative study was made in several aspects including the total charges, the incidenc of complications, an operative mortality and postoperative survival rate. Results: No severe postoperative 、complications and hospital deaths occurred in groups AB , but in group C the complications and deaths rate were 、、$14.29%, 6.12% respectively. Hospital cost in groups ABC were 1756.56±$151.09, 9437.50±$889.85, 20568.50±7108.39 respectively (P0.01). But the one-year survival rate in group A (18.75%) was lower than that in groups B (74.07%) and C (60.87%), P0.01, and there was no significant difference between the groups B and C ( P0.05). Conclusion: The esophageal stent implanted for advanced esophageal carcinoma is an effective and safe method and esophagectomy should be selected carefully.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?