Effect of Different Nutritional Support Modes on Humoral Immunity and Outcomes after Esophagectomy
TAN Tai-chang,YE Chang-ning,FANG Qiang,REN Guang-guo,HAN Yong-tao,PENG Lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-635x.2011.06.005
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore the effect of different nutritional support mdoes on humoral immunity and outcomes after esophagectomy in patients with esophageal carcinoma.Methods Forty-six patients with middle or low thoracic esophageal carcinoma underwent Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.The patients were randomized into enteral nutrition group ( EN,n =23 ) and enteral combined parenteral nutrition group ( EN + PN,n =23 ) based on the nutrition support modes.Serum levels of immunoglobulin (IgG,IgA,IgM,IgE,κ/λ light chain) and comphments (C3/C4) were assayed and compared on the 1st pre-operative day and at 18 hours as well as 3rd and 7th day after operation.The clinical outcomes including infection-related complications and hospital stay were compared between two group s.Results There was no significant difference in all humoral immunity indicators between two groups at the eachpost-operative time point.In both two groups,the levels ofIgG [ (8.90 ± 1.75),(7.53 ±1.41) g/Land (8.64±2.44),(7.48±2.16) g/L],κ [ (2.14±0.46),(1.78±0.41) g/L,and (2.15 ±0.63),( 1.86 ± 0.62) g/L] and λ light chain [ ( 1.34 ± 0.45 ),( 1.11 ± 0.31 ) g/L and ( 1.20 ± 0.32),( 1.08 ± 0.35 ) g/L] were significantly lower 18 hours and 3rd day after operation than the pre-operative levels [ (12.15±2.86)and (11.11±2.96) g/L,(2.90±0.77) and (2.77±0.79) g/L,(1.79±0.57) and (1.56±0.41) g/L] (P=0.000,P=0.000,and P=0.004,P=0.000,and P=0.000,P=0.000,and P=0.011,P=0.000,and P=0.004,P=0.000,and P =0.008,P =0.000),and returned to the preoperative levels by the postoperative 7th day (P＞0.05),except for the level of κ light chain 7th day after operation in EN group [ ( 2.42 ± 0.69) g/L] ( P =0.027 ).The levels of IgA,IgE,and C3 were not significantly different during the perioperative period ( P ＞ 0.05 ).The level of IgM was not significantly different during the perioperative period in EN group (P ＞0.05),and was significantly lower on the 3rd post-operative day [ ( 1.00 ±0.53) g/L] than the pre-operative level [ ( 1.47 ±0.76) g/L] in the EN + PN group (P =0.031 ),and were not significantly different on the other time points (P ＞ 0.05 ).In the EN group,the C4 level was significantly lower at the postoperative 18 hours [ (0.24 ±0.08) g/L] than the pre-operative level [ (0.37 ±0.36) g/L] (P =0.030),and were not significantly different at the other time points ( P ＞ 0.05 ).In the EN + PN group,the C4 level was not significantly different during the perioperative period ( P ＞ 0.05 ).There was no significant difference in the infection-related complications and hospital stay between these two groups ( P =0.300,P =0.371 ).Conclusions The effects of EN or EN + PN on humoral immunity and outcomes after esophagectomy in patients with esophageal carcinoma are not different.Both these two nutritional support modes can not completely alleviate the harm to the humoral immunity.The EN is more cost-effective.