Early Enteral Nutrition Versus Early Supplemental Parenteral Nutrition in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery: a Secondary Analysis of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials.
Xuejin Gao,Yupeng Zhang,Xin Qi,Yaqin Xiao,Tingting Gao,Gang Jin,Kunhua Wang,Yanbing Zhou,Qiang Chi,Hua Yang,Mengbin Li,Jianchun Yu,Huanlong Qin,Yun Tang,Xiaoting Wu,Guoli Li,Li Zhang,Xinying Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.02.006
IF: 8.472
2024-01-01
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Abstract:Background: The effect of early isoenergetic feeding routes [early enteral nutrition (E -EN) or early supplemental parenteral nutrition (E-SPN)] on the outcome of patients undergoing major abdominal surgery is controversial. Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of early isoenergetic EN compared with early isoenergetic SPN on nosocomial infections in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Methods: This study is a secondary, post hoc analysis of data from 2 open -label randomized clinical trials. Participants were recruited from the general surgery department of 11 academic hospitals in China undergoing major abdominal surgery and with Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 score >= 3. All eligible patients were categorized into 2 groups based on their achievement of the 100% energy target on postoperative day (POD) 3: the E -EN group ( n = 199) and the E-SPN group ( n = 115). The primary outcome was the incidence of nosocomial infections between POD 3 and hospital discharge. Results: In total, 314 patients [mean (SD) age, 59.2 (11.4) y; 113 (36.0%) females] were included. Patients in the E -EN group showed no signi fi cant difference in nosocomial infections compared with those in the E-SPN group {17/199 [8.5%] compared with 10/115 [8.7%], risk difference, 0.2% [95% con fi dence interval (CI): - 6.3, 6.6]}. The hematological nutritional status of the E -EN group showed a signi fi cant improvement at discharge compared with the E-SPN group (albumin: 38.0 +/- 6.0 g/L compared with 35.5 +/- 7.6 g/L; mean difference, - 2.5 g/L; 95% CI: - 4.0, - 1.0 g/L; prealbumin: 200.0 +/- 8.0 mg/L compared with 158.4 +/- 38.1 mg/L; mean difference, - 41.6 mg/L; 95% CI: - 41.7, - 36.1 mg/L). Other indicators were comparable between groups. Conclusion: E -EN compared with isoenergetic SPN may not be associated with a reduced rate of nosocomial infection in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, but may be associated with improved hematological nutritional status.