Clinical significance of uncemented long femoral stem prosthesis in the treatment of Vancouver type B perprosthetic femoral fractures

Er-ping YANG,Hao PENG,Yuan-li DU,Jie LIANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350.2016.09.021
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the clinical results of femoral revision using an uncemented long femoral stems with wire or memory titanium alloy embracing fixator in the treatment of Vancouver type B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 17 cases of periprosthetic femoral fracture treated with the un-cemented long femoral stem prosthesis. Of these, eight cases were Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures, and nine cases were Vancouver type B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures. The clinical outcomes were assessed with Harris hip score. Radiological evaluations were conducted using Beals and Tower'criteria, and any complication during the fol-low-up period was recorded. Results The average follow-up period was 41.7 months. The average Harris hip score was 68.2 at the final follow-up. All fractures were united. There was femoral stem subsidence less than 10 mm in 4 cases with-out an evidence of loosening both radiologically and clinically. The radiological results using Beals and Towers' criteria were excellent in eight cases, good in five and poor in four. Conclusion An uncemented long femoral stem prosthesis with wire or memory titanium alloy embracing fixator provides a good fracture stability that promotes fracture healing and offers a successful solution for the management of Vancouver type B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?