Abstract:Objective To observe the clinical outcomes of the surgical management of periprosthetic femoral fractures following hip arthroplasty.Methods Twelve consecutive patients (6 male and 6 female) with the average age of 66.4± 15.0 years old (35 to 86 years old) undergoing surgical operation for periprosthetic femoral fractures between September 2009 and May 2016 were followed up at our center.Nine cases were fractured secondary to the primary hip arthroplasty while the others were patients with earlier revision surgery.The previous fixations of femoral components of 10 cases were cementless while the other two were cemented fixation.The enrolled patients were determined as Vancouver type B 1 (n=2),type B2 (n=7),type B3 (n=1) and type C (n=2) respectively.The occurrences of the fractures were observed at 3 weeks to 17 years post-operation (average 9.0±7.0 years).The patients were treated individually according to different Vancouver types.Type B 1 patients received simple cerclage fixation,as well as revisions with long-stem femoral implants and cerclage band were chosen for type B2 patients.In addition to the treatment for type B2 patients,allogenic cortical bone graft was also required for type B3 patients.Open reduction with locking plate internal fixations were options for patients with Vancouver type C fractures.The following-up included the X-ray images of the hips,Harris hip score and the visual analogue scale (VAS) for the pain of fracture site.The unions of the fractures were determined by both X-ray images and pain intensity of the fracture sites.Results The mean follow-up period was 41.6±26.0 months (range,12-92 months),without patient lost to follow up.VAS scores were 0,implying the clinical union of the fractures.One patients received multiple debridement post-operatively due to the periprosthetic infection.The VAS score of this patient was 6 at the follow up and the X-ray image indicated the nonunion of the fracture.The fracture union rate was 91.7％ (11/12).The Harris hip score was 23-92 (mean score,74.8±18.8),excellent for 2 cases,good for 6 cases,fair for 3 cases and poor for 1 case.The excellent and good rate was 66.7％ (8/12).Post-operative complications were observed in 4 patients (33.3％,4/12).One drainage tube was misplaced and sutured subcutaneously required a further exploration surgery.One periprosthetic infection occurring post-operatively induced the nonunion of the fracture.Aseptic loosing of femoral stem was observed in 2 cases and subsequent revision surgeries were conducted.Conclusion High incidence of complications is observed after the surgical treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures following hip arthroplasty.Individually customized management regarding to the Vancouver type of periprosthetic femoral fractures leads to the clinical fracture union in 91.7％ of the patients in this case series.The excellent and good rate of the hip function in the early and mid-term stage after operation is 66.7％.

Midterm follow-up of long handle prosthesis-Solution extensively titanium porous coated stem with wire cerclage in revision of Vancouver type-B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures after hemiarthroplasty

Non-contemporaneous bilateral stem fractures occurring after staged bilateral hip revision using extensively porous-coated cylindrical femoral stems: a case report

Surgical Treatments for Vancouver Type B1 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures

Combined Use of Extensively Porous Coated Femoral Components with Onlay Cortical Strut Allografts in Revision of Vancouver B2 and B3 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures

Femoral Component Revision Using Extensively Porous-Coated Cementless Stem.

Long-Term Effectiveness of Total Hip Replacement with the Collum Femoris Preserving Prosthesis

Clinical and Radiographic Results of Total Hip Arthroplasty with Collum Femoris Preserving Prosthesis:an over 5 Years Follow Up

Outcome after Treatment of Vancouver B2 Peri-Prosthetic Femoral Fractures: Revision Arthroplasty and Compression Cerclage System Fixation

[Analysis on Morphology and Stability of Femoral Hip Prosthesis Based on the Revision Operation].

Long stem revision versus short stem revision with plate osteosynthesis for Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fracture: a comparative study of eighty five cases

Parallel molecular computations of pairwise exclusive-or (XOR) using DNA "string tile" self-assembly.

Does the Cementless, Hydroxyapatite on Porous, Long-stem Prosthesis Perform Well in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Multicenter Observation.

[Mid-Term Follow-Up Study of Hip Arthroplasty for Internal Fixation Failure of Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures in the Elderly].

Surgical management in treating periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty

Total hip arthroplasties in 190 cases: follow-up study]

Scheduling Groups of Unit Length Jobs on Two Identical Parallel Machines

Mid-Term Follow-Up Results After Hemiarthroplasty Using Long Femoral Stem Prosthesis (Peerless-160) for Intertrochanteric Fractures in Octogenarians

Femoral Prosthesis Fracture after Hip Arthroplasty Revision: A Case Report and Review of Literature

Lac permease of Escherichia coli: on the path of the proton.

On the Number of Arc-Disjoint Hamiltonian Circuits in the de Bruijn Graph

[Using Titanium Cerclage Band to Teat Intra- and Post-Operative Femoral Fracture in Total Hip Arthroplasty].