Clinical effects of laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy on localized renal carcinoma

Yuquan Xue,Zhenlong Wang,Yaping Zhang,Tie Chong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j.issn.1673-4777.2018.08.023
2018-01-01
Abstract:Objective To analyze the clinical effects of laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery(NSS) and radical nephrectomy(RN) on localized renal carcinoma.Methods A total of 220 patients with localized renal carcinoma admitted between January 2015 and June 2017 in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University were randomly divided into observation group(n =95) and control group(n =125).The observation group was treated with laparoscopic NSS and the control group was treated with laparoscopic RN.Operation time,intraoperative blood loss,serum creatinine level,metastasis and recurrence were analyzed.Results Conversion to laparotomy rate,postoperative incidence of complications,drainage volume,fasting time and hospital stay time showed no significant differences between groups (P > 0.05).Operation time in observation group was significantly longer and intraoperative blood loss was significantly more than those in control group [(117 ± 23) min vs (86 ±32) min,(98 ± 24) ml vs (71 ± 12) ml] (P < 0.05).Before surgery,serum creatinine had no significant between observation group and control group[(95 ± 12) μmol/L vs (98 ± 12) μmol/L] (P >0.05).One day and 3,6 months after surgery,serum creatinine level was significantly higher than that before surgery;serum creatinine levels in observation group were significantly lower than those in control group [(112 ± 17) μmol/L vs (124 ± 18) μmol/L,(110 ± 14) μmol/L vs (120 ± 15) μmol/L,(108 ± 13) μmol/L vs (120 ± 14) μmol/L] (P <0.05).No tumor recurrence,metastasis and death occurred during 6-24 months of follow-up.Conclusions Both laparoscopic RN and NSS are effective in treatment of localized renal carcinoma.NSS can reduce renal damage more effectively than RN.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?