Curative effect observation of somatostatin in the non-surgical treatment of malignant bowel obstruction caused by gastroenteric tumor

殷华芳,王琼,袁明,吴丹,王南瑶,费燕华,刘涛,孙霞
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2014.31.228
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To observe the curative effect of somatostatin in the non-surgical treatment of malignant bowel obstruction (MBO). Methods A total of 60 cases with MBO were randomly divided into conventional therapy group (control group, n=28) and somatostatin group (treatment group, n=32). The treatment group received conventional therapy combined with somatostatin (6 mg/d through continuous intravenous pumping) for 3~12 d. The short-term curative effects of the two groups were compared. Results The clinical symptom of the treatment group was improved, compared with the control group. The remission rates of abdominal pain and distention in the two groups were 81.25%and 57.14%, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The rates of defecation and exhaust recovery in the two groups were 71.88% and 53.57%, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The exhaust recovery time of the treatment group was (4.5±1.5) d, which was obviously shorter than (6.8±2.1) d of the control group (P<0.05). The gastrointestinal drainage volume of the treatment group as (256±152) ml/d was remarkably less than (489±198) ml/d of the control group, and the difference had statistical significance (P<0.01). The plain abdominal radiograph showed the disappearance of pneumatosis and hydrops in intestinal canal, and the effect in the treatment group (84.38%) was obviously better than that of the control group (67.86%) (P<0.05). The life quality of patients was improved, and the KPS scores of the two groups were (58±10) points and (41±9) points. The difference between the two group was statistically significant (P<0.01). Conclusion Somatostatin combined with conventional therapy is effective in the treatment of MBO. It can remarkably improve the symptoms of MBO and enhance the life quality of patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?