Comparison of clinical efficacy between subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy and high retroperito-neal varicocelectomy

Kunlong Lyu,Jianbin Wu,Guantu Wu,Jintao Zhuang,Liang Zhao,Chunhua Deng,Xiang'an Tu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/g.issn.0253-9802.2015.03.005
2015-01-01
New Medicine
Abstract:Objective To statistically compare the clinical efficacy between subinguinal microsurgi-cal and high retroperitoneal varicocelectomies in the treatment of varicocele.Methods Among 233 patients with varicocele enrolled in this study,1 46 receiving subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy were assigned in the microscopic surgery group and the other 87 undergoing high retroperitoneal varicocelectomy in the high liga-tion group.Postoperative follow up endured for 6 ~1 2 months.The number of internal spermatic veins ligated intraoperatively,operating time and postoperative efficacy were statistically compared between two groups.Re-sults The mean number of internal spermatic veins ligated intraoperatively in the microscopic surgery and high ligation groups were 1 3.7 and 1 .8 (P <0.001 ),the mean operating time was 83.8 min and 31 .4 min (P <0.001 ),the recurrence rates were 2.3% and 1 5.0% (P =0.001 ),the spontaneous pregnancy rates were 48% and 26% (P =0.034),the improvement rates of semen quality were 84% and 63% (P =0.004)and the rates of pain alleviation were 89% and 62% (P =0.025 ).No incidence of testicular atrophy and /or hydrocele was identified in either group postoperatively.Conclusions Compared to high retroperitoneal varico-celectomy,subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy yields a larger number of internal spermatic veins intraop-eratively ligated,lower reccurrence rate and higher rates of spontaneous pregnancy,semen quality improvement and pain alleviation.However,the operating time of subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy is longer.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?