Abstract:Purpose: The aim of the study was to compare the clinical outcomes, sperm parameters, and complications of loupe-assisted and microscopic varicocele repair in patients with infertility due to moderate-to-severe varicocele. Methods: We included all male individuals over 18 years of age who underwent inguinal varicocele repair at our center due to infertility. Subjects with azoospermia, genetic abnormalities such as Kallmann syndrome, incomplete medical records, or those lost to follow-up were excluded from the study. Patients were divided into two groups based on the magnification tool used (microscope or loupe). Follow-ups were conducted at 3 months and 1 year post-surgery. Sperm parameters, pregnancy rates, and surgical complications were recorded to compare the efficacy of the magnification tools. The Improvement Index for sperm parameters was calculated by dividing the difference between the post-operative and pre-operative parameters by the pre-operative parameter. An Improvement Index above 0.5 was considered a good outcome. Results: Out of 104 patients, 58 underwent loupe-assisted and 46 underwent microscopic varicocele repair. Sperm concentration and progressive motility increased significantly in the semen analyses at three months and one year post-operation compared to pre-operative semen analyses. However, increases in sperm morphology were not statistically significant in either follow-up semen analysis. An Improvement Index greater than 0.5 (indicating a good outcome) was observed in 35.3%, 34.1%, and 15.2% of patients for sperm concentration, progressive motility, and morphology, respectively, after 3 months, and 38.9%, 43.4%, and 22.4% after 1 year. Nonetheless, there were no significant differences in the Improvement Index of sperm parameters between the two magnification methods. The operative duration was significantly longer with microscopic magnification (median of 70.0 [20.0] minutes vs. 45.0 [20.0] minutes) (p value < 0.001). Conversely, the pregnancy rates were 34.5% (20 patients) in the loupe-assisted group and 37.0% (17 patients) in the microscopic group, which was not significantly different (p value: 0.794). Similarly, the rate of complications was not significantly different, with 5 patients (10.9%) experiencing complications (4 hydroceles and 1 wound infection) in the microscopic group compared to 4 patients (6.9%) (3 hydroceles and 1 wound infection) in the loupe-assisted group (p value: 0.504). Conclusions: The current study's results indicate that the clinical outcomes, sperm parameters, and complications associated with loupe-assisted varicocele repair are comparable to those of microsurgical varicocele repair, which is considered the gold standard. We suggest conducting prospective studies to assess whether loupe-assisted varicocele repair is a safe alternative, especially in centers with limited or no access to surgical microscopes.

Assessing safety and efficacy of microscopic and laparoscopic varicocoelectomy for varicocoele treatment: A comparative cohort study

Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Microsurgery for Varicocele of Adult Males: A Meta-Analysis.

A comparison between the efficacy and complication of laparoscopic and microsurgical varicocelectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis

(337) Microsurgical Varicocelectomy Improves Seminal Parameters in Infertile Men: 10-year Experience in a University Hospital

Clinical effectiveness of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy with enhanced recovery after surgery for varicocele

Clinical Effect Of Microscopic Subinguinal Varicocelectomy Or Bypass Surgery On Nutcracker Phenomenon-Associated Varicocele

Induced Asymmetry of Unsaturated Radicals in Optically Active Compounds

Use of 3-dimensional printing technology and silicone modeling in surgical simulation: development and face validation in pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Effects and Complications of Five Surgical Approaches to the Treatment of Varicocele: A Comparative Study

The fornix.

Incidence of complications:a comparative study of open inguinal,laparoscopic and microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy

Clinical efficacy and safety evaluation of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy versus high retroperitoneal varicocelectomy in the treatment of massive varicocele

Oncocytic papillary renal cell carcinoma: a clinicopathological study emphasizing distinct morphology, extended immunohistochemical profile and cytogenetic features.

The Comparative Study of Two Kinds of Surgical Approach in Treatment of Varicocele: with a Report of 113 Cases

A closer look: sperm analysis and clinical outcomes of microscopic and loupe-assisted varicocele repair in male infertility due to moderate-to-severe varicocele

Feasibility of loupe assisted subinguinal varicocelectomy in treatment of male infertility

Comparison between Microsurgical Varicocelectomy with and without Testicular Delivery for Treatment of Varicocele: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

[Laparoscopic Extraperitoneal High Ligation of the Spermatic Vein for the Treatment of Varicocele].

A comparison of loupe-assisted and non-loupe-assisted subinguinal varicocelectomy

Comparison of Two Approaches in Microsurgical Varicocelectomy in Chinese Infertile Males

[Postoperative complications of microscopic versus Palomo varicocelectomy for varicocele in army personnel]