Fluorescence activated cell sorting versus Magnetic activated cell sorting in purification of T lymphocytes

Yingying Huang,Shengxia Yin,Wenqiang Cao,Yanwei Li,Jiajia Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2016.22.001
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To establish an efficient,highly active sorting method for isolating and purifying T lymphocytes;To compare Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) with Magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) in isolating CD8+ T lymphocytes in the spleen of mice.Methods The evaluation was based on the cytologic purity,recovery,activity,morphology and time consumption in the 2 sorting methods.Results (1) The purification rate of CD8+ T lymphocytes was (99.5 ± 0.00) % in FACS and (95.6 ± 0.25) % in MACS.(2) The recovery rate of CD8+ T lymphocytes was (74.33 ± 3.28) % in FACS and (60.00 ± 1.53) % in MACS.(3) The time consumption was 1.5 h in FACS and 2.5 h in MACS.(4) The activity ofT lymphocytes was higher in FACS than in MACS.(5) The isolated and purified T lymphocytes by FACS emerged colony growth at 12 h and optimum growth at 24 h,while the cells by MACS grew slower than that by FACS.Conclusion The efficiency and cytologic activity of FACS are higher than those of MACS in isolating T lymphocytes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?