Comparative Study of Surgical Clipping and Endovascular Interventional Therapy for Intracranial Aneurysm

张青松,陈谦学,周毅,胡克琦,彭鹏
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective: The effects of surgical clipping and endovascular interventional therapy for intracranial aneurysms.Methods:A retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 85 cases of intracranial aneurysm patients, 40 patients with surgical clipping treatment,45 cases were treated by endovascular interventional therapy, the prognosis of patients in the two groups were compared, ADL and NIHSS score, adverse reaction, hospitalization time and average time of treatment.Results:Surgical clipping group with good prognosis was 85% and 15% of poor prognosis; intravascular interventional group with good prognosis was 88.9%, 11.1% of poor prognosis, the two groups of patients the rate of good and bad prognosis rate differences no statistical significance (P>0.05). Surgical clip closed group and vascular interventional group, the incidence of aneurysm again broken, infection, hydrocephalus, cerebral vasospasm and lumbar puncture, the adverse reaction probability of little difference, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Surgical clipping in the treatment group, the time and hospitalization time higher than that of intravascular interventional group and medical costs lower than intravascular interventional group, the two groups of patients with operation average treatment time, hospitalization time, medical cost difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion:Surgical clipping and endovascular interventional treatment of intracranial aneurysms have better effect, the shorter operative time, shorter hospital stay and less economic burden. Clinical treatment should be combined with the specific circumstances of the patient to choose the best treatment options, improve the operation, reduce the incidence of adverse reactions, improve the survival rate of patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?