Effect of different management modalities and timings on the short-term efficacy in patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms

WU Qi,ZHANG Xin,HANG Chun-hua,ZHANG Qing-rong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-5921.2009.05.003

2009-01-01

Abstract:Objective To observed the clinical efficacy of management of ruptured intracranial aneurysms with different modalities(microsurgery or endovascular treatment) and timings of treatment(within or delayed after 72 hours).Methods The clinical data of 299 patients with 328 aneurysms were analyzed retrospectively.They were divided into microsurgery group(n=186) and endovascular treatment group(n=113).After 15 patients were excluded from the microsurgery group,there were 29 in the early operation group and 142 in the delayed operation group.In the endovascular treatment group,there were 37 in the early operation group and 76 in the delayed operation group.The hospitalization days,the Glasgow Outcome Scale(GOS) scores and the complications at discharge and 6 months after the procedure were observed.Results ①The mortality rates in the microsurgery group and the endovascular treatment group were 5.9%(11/186) and 3.5%(4/113.P>0.05),respectively;the favorable rates of GOS scores(Grade Ⅳ to Ⅴ) at 6 months after the treatment were 84.5%(153/181) and 95.5%(105/110.P<0.01),respectively;the average hospitalization days were 16±7 and 12±6 days(P<0.01),respectively.②The mortality rates in the early and the delayed operation group were 10.4%(3/29) and 3.5%(5/142.P>0.05),respectively;the average hospitalization days were 14±5 and 17±7 days(P<0.05),respectively;the favorable rates of GOS score at 6 months after the treatment were 85.7%(24/28) and 87.7%(121/138.P>0.05),respectively;in the endovascular treatment group,the mortalities in the early operation and delayed operation groups were 2.7%(1/37) and 3.9%(3/76),respectively;the average hospitalization days were 12±5 and 12±6 days,respectively;the favorable rates of GOS scores at 6 months were 97.3%(36/37) and 94.5%(69/73.P>0.05 all),respectively.The incidence of cerebral vasospasm in the microsurgery group was significantly higher than that in the endovascular treatment group(25.8% vs 9.7%,P<0.01);there were no significant difference between the 2 groups in the compli-cations such as of re-bleeding and hydrocephalus.Conclusion The short-term clinical efficacy of endovascular treatment in patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms is superior to microsurgery,while the different timings of treatment opportunities has no affect on the prognosis of patients significantly.