The significance of early treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysm
HE Feng,YAN Xin,HU Shi-wen,LIU Zong-ming,LIN Gui-jun,GAO Feng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-351X.2010.03.018
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore the significance of the early surgical or interventional therapy of ruptured intracranial aneurysm.Methods 62 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysm presenting primary subarachnoid hemorrhage(Hunt-Hesss ScaleⅠ-Ⅳ)were retrospectively analyzed,of which,rebleeding occurred in 13 cases during hospital stay.Out of the 62 patients,25 cases were treated with alone clipping,27 cases with alone interventional embolism,3 with combined surgical and interventional therapy.7 cases with rebleeding and in the status of Hunt-Hess Ⅴ were treated conservatively.The outcome was evaluated with GOS scale.Results In this series,the rebleeding rate is 21%,out of the 13 patients with rebleeding,good outcome occurred in 5 cases(38.5%)and bad outcome in 8 cases(61.5%).In the patients without rebleeding,good outcome and bad outcome occurred in 42 cases(85.7%)and 7 cases(14.3%)respectively.The outcome is significantly different in the two groups.Out of the 4 patients with definite vasospasm,good outcome occurred in 1 case and bad outcome in 3 cases.Out of 21 cases treated early within 3 days(early group),19cases got good outcome(90.48%);24 cases treated from 3th day to 2 week(medium group),17 cases recovered good(70.83%);10 cases treated 2 weeks later(late group),6 cases recovered good(60.00%);compared with the medium and late groups,the outcome of early group got statistically significant.Conclusion It is necessary to treat the patient with ruptured intracranial aneurysm promptly to prevent rebleeding and the ensuing fatal consequences.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?