Effects of Dietary Protein on Activities of Digestive Enzyme and Trypsin Mrna Abundance in Eriocheir Sinensis Juveniles

JIANG Hong-bo,CHEN Li-qiao,WANG Qun,ZHAO Xiao-qin,YU Na,NI Juan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-0615.2005.02.013
2005-01-01
Abstract:Three experimental feeds with dietary protein content of 45, 35 and 25% were formulated to rear juvenile Eriocheir sinensis, for 40 days, with initial mean weight of 6 ± 0. 5g, taking live food as control. Juvenile crabs were dissected after feeding 10, 20 and 40 days respectively and hepatopancreas obtained. Then activities of trypsin and amylase in hepatopancreas were measured. The results were as follows: (1) activities of trypsin in hepatopancreas of juvenile crab fed with live food did not show significant difference throughout the trials (P 0.05). Effects of dietary protein on trypsin activities indicated remarkable difference after feeding 20 days, trypsin activities fed with 25% protein diet was lower than the others ( P 0.05).(2) the highest value of amylase activities in hepatopancreas of juvenile crabs fed with live food occurred on the 10th day, reaching 49.39, then decreased gradually. Activities of amylase were significantly affected by dietary protein for three diets with different protein levels from the 10th day (P 0.05). On the 20th day, amylase activity of 45 % protein diet was 23.85, significantly lower than that of the two others ( P 0.05). And on the 40th day, amylase activity of the control group and 25% protein diet was significantly higher than that of 45% and 35% protein diet (P0. 05). The experimental results suggested that trypsin in hepatopancreas of juvenile E. sinensis had good adaptation to dietary protein, whereas amylase was inhibited by higher dietary protein level. Higher trypsin activities due to higher dietary protein help to digest more of dietary protein. Trypsin mRNA abundance in hepatopancreas of E. sinensis juveniles fed with live food was the highest of 0.628, and significantly higher than that fed with 35% and 25% protein diets ( P 0.05), but there was no significant difference between control group and 45% protein diet group. Neither was between 35% and 25% protein diet group. It suggested that molecular regulation of trypsin adaptation to dietary protein levels might attribute to transcription for trypsin.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?