Growth and development characteristics of Castanea henryi by different pollination methods

Zhoujun ZHU,Deyi YUAN,Xiaoming FAN,Xuhui ZHANG,Luman TAN,Dongming LIU,Chengxiang LI,Bifang WANG,Zhiqiang LIU,Gang WANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13323/j.cnki.j.fafu(nat.sci.).2016.06.006
2016-01-01
Abstract:To optimize planting practices for maximum yield, ‘Huali 3’ Castanea henryi was pollinated by 4 methods, including cross pollination ( Cp) , self pollination ( Sp) , non-pollination ( Nop) and natural pollination ( Nap) . Fresh weights of involucre and ovary, vertical and horizontal development during the growth, rates of bud sitting, fruit abscission and empty bract were recorded. Results showed that it took 135 days to reach maturity. Growth rates of fresh weights of involucre and ovary from Cp and Nap, and involucre from Sp and Nop showed pattern of“slow-fast-slow-fast”, while changes in fresh weights of ovary from Sp and Nop showed pattern of “slow-fast-slow”. When the fruit rippen, sizes of involucre and ovary from 4 pollination methods were Cp, Nap, Sp and Nop in a descending order. In terms of bud sitting and fruit abscission, C.henryi that received Nap experienced peaks of fruit abscis-sion twice while those received Sp and Nop experienced peaks three times. Similarly, all peaks occurred 90-105 days after flower-ing. Rates of bud sitting and seed setting varied greatly among all pollination methods, which were from Cp, Nap, Sp and Nop in a descending order, and those for empty bract were Nop, Sp, Nap and Cp in a descending order. In conclusion, flowering stage ( 0 days after anthesis) and rapid fruit growth period ( 45-60 days and 90-105 days after anthesis) were critical periods for fruit devel-opment. Irrigation and fertilization should be emphasized during these stages for maximum yield.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?