Particle size distribution and energy dissipation of saturated crushed sandstone under compaction

YU Bangyong,CHEN Zhanqing,DAI Yuwei,XU Miaomiao,WEI Jianjun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13545/j.cnki.jmse.2018.01.027
2018-01-01
Abstract:Compaction tests on saturated crushed sandstone with lateral constraint and different initial gradation (Talbot exponent is 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8, respectively) were conducted. And Micro-CT system was adopted to observe the changing process of the pore structures. Meanwhile, the characterization of the particle size distribution was quantitatively obtained based on the fractal theory. The properties of energy dissipation were analyzed through calculating the strain energy density. Results indicate that the axial strain ranges from 0.3045 to 0.3241 when the axial stress is 16 MPa. At the early stage of compac-tion, the samples are loose, the contact among particles is unstable, and the pore size is large with good connectivity. However, at the later stage, the samples are dense with most pores being relatively stable triangle. The particle size distribution of saturated crushed sandstone under compaction satisfies fractal condition well, and the fractal dimension ranges from 1.7331 to 2.5610. When the axial stress is less than 4 MPa, the particle crushing occurs extensively and the fractal dimension increases rapidly during compaction. In contrast, while the axial stress is more than 4 MPa, the particle crushing occurs slightly and the fractal dimension increases slowly. With the increase in axial strain and fractal dimension, the energy dissipation caused by deformation increases at an accelerated rate. After the axial strain exceeds 0.17 or the fractal dimension exceeds 2.1, the strain energy density increases rapidly. It should be pointed out that the initial gradation affects the evolution of particle size distribution and energy dissipa-tion. Under the same axial stress, the fractal dimension decreases with an increase in the Talbot expo-nent. While under the same axial strain, the strain energy density declines with an increase in the Talbot exponent.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?