Abstract:Background As the world’s largest coal producer, China was accounted for about 46% of global coal production. Among present coal mining risks, methane gas (called gas in this paper) explosion or ignition in an underground mine remains ever-present. Although many techniques have been used, gas accidents associated with the complex elements of underground gassy mines need more robust monitoring or warning systems to identify risks. This paper aimed to determine which single method between the PCA and Entropy methods better establishes a responsive weighted indexing measurement to improve coal mining safety. Methods Qualitative and quantitative mixed research methodologies were adopted for this research, including analysis of two case studies, correlation analysis, and comparative analysis. The literature reviewed the most-used multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods, including subjective methods and objective methods. The advantages and disadvantages of each MCDM method were briefly discussed. One more round literature review was conducted to search publications between 2017 and 2019 in CNKI. Followed two case studies, correlation analysis and comparative analysis were then conducted. Research ethics was approved by the Shanxi Coking Coal Group Research Committee. Results The literature searched a total of 25,831publications and found that the PCA method was the predominant method adopted, and the Entropy method was the second most widely adopted method. Two weighting methods were compared using two case studies. For the comparative analysis of Case Study 1, the PCA method appeared to be more responsive than the Entropy. For Case Study 2, the Entropy method is more responsive than the PCA. As a result, both methods were adopted for different cases in the case study mine and finally deployed for user acceptance testing on 5 November 2020. Conclusions The findings and suggestions were provided as further scopes for further research. This research indicated that no single method could be adopted as the better option for establishing indexing measurement in all cases. The practical implication suggests that comparative analysis should always be conducted on each case and determine the appropriate weighting method to the relevant case. This research recommended that the PCA method was a dimension reduction technique that could be handy for identifying the critical variables or factors and effectively used in hazard, risk, and emergency assessment. The PCA method might also be well-applied for developing predicting and forecasting systems as it was sensitive to outliers. The Entropy method might be suitable for all the cases requiring the MCDM. There is also a need to conduct further research to probe the causal reasons why the PCA and Entropy methods were applied to each case and not the other way round. This research found that the Entropy method provides higher accuracy than the PCA method. This research also found that the Entropy method demonstrated to assess the weights of the higher dimension dataset was higher sensitivity than the lower dimensions. Finally, the comprehensive analysis indicates a need to explore a more responsive method for establishing a weighted indexing measurement for warning applications in hazard, risk, and emergency assessments.

Safety Evaluation for Mine Fire Based on Entropy Weight Matter Element Extension

Application of the Entropy Weight and TOPSIS Method in Safety Evaluation of Coal Mines

The Evaluation of Coal Mine Safety Based on Entropy Method and Mutation Theory

Ecological Resilience Assessment of an Arid Coal Mining Area Using Index of Entropy and Linear Weighted Analysis: A Case Study of Shendong Coalfield, China

Comprehensive Evaluation Model of Coal Mine Safety under the Combination of Game Theory and TOPSIS

Comprehensive evaluation of mine cable fire hazards based on entropy weight-grey correlation method

Coal Mine Fire Emergency Rescue Capability Assessment and Emergency Disposal Research

Study of a Comprehensive Assessment Method for Coal Mine Safety Based on a Hierarchical Grey Analysis

A comparative analysis of the principal component analysis and entropy weight methods to establish the indexing measurement

Risk assessment method in relation to coal mine gas explosion based on safety information loss

Microbial ecology associated with soft-tissue infections.

Risk identification of coal spontaneous combustion based on COWA modified G1 combination weighting cloud model

Comprehensive evaluation of coal burst risk using optimized linear weighted model

Multi-dimensional safety risk assessment on coal mines under the profitability dilemma

Study on the Effectiveness of the Integral Emergency Response System for Coal Mine Water Hazard Accidents Based on Combination Weighting

Research of Security Assessment of the Spontaneous Combustion Risk Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process

A comprehensive risk assessment method for hot work in underground mines based on G1-EWM and unascertained measure theory

An Integrated Entropy Weight and Grey Clustering Method–Based Evaluation to Improve Safety in Mines

Study on controlling factors and developing a quantitative assessment model for spontaneous combustion hazard of coal gangue

PRELIMINARY ESTABLISHMENT OF MODEL FOR JUDGING DIFFICULTY AND EASINESS OF PULVERISED COAL IGNITION

Risk Assessment of Coal Mine Flood Disasters Based on Projection Pursuit Clustering Model